Residential yard management and landscape cover affect urban bird community diversity across the continental USA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susannah B. Lerman ◽  
Desirée L. Narango ◽  
Meghan L. Avolio ◽  
Anika R. Bratt ◽  
Jesse M. Engebretson ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
J D Matheson ◽  
D W Larson

Cliffs along the Niagara Escarpment in Ontario, Canada, support a long, narrow presettlement forest that includes three distinct geomorphic and vegetation zones: cliff edge, cliff face, and talus slope. This unique landform provides an opportunity to evaluate differences in bird communities between the escarpment and adjacent forest relative to habitat features. We sampled forest birds 12 times during the summer of 1994 in plots located in plateau forests, on talus slope, at cliff edges, and on cliff faces. Eleven habitat variables considered important to birds were also sampled in the plots. We arranged plots along six randomly spaced transects at a south site and a north site. Both sites had the consistent habitat heterogeneity considered important to birds. Bird species richness and composition responded to this heterogeneity, but differently at each site: plateau deciduous forests always had the lowest richness and the simplest species composition, whereas both cliff edges and talus slopes had a higher diversity of birds. Cliff faces had large numbers of species in the south but smaller numbers in the north. Escarpment zones form a habitat mosaic that supports many species not found in the adjacent forest and is consistent with the effect of habitat edge. The results suggest that cliffs represent a significant additive influence on avian biodiversity, even when the cliff is a very narrow component of the landscape.


PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e1806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilia Cuatianquiz Lima ◽  
Constantino Macías Garcia

Secondary cavity nesting (SCN) birds breed in holes that they do not excavate themselves. This is possible where there are large trees whose size and age permit the digging of holes by primary excavators and only rarely happens in forest plantations, where we expected a deficit of both breeding holes and SCN species. We assessed whether the availability of tree cavities influenced the number of SCNs in two temperate forest types, and evaluated the change in number of SCNs after adding nest boxes. First, we counted all cavities within each of our 25-m radius sampling points in mature and young forest plots during 2009. We then added nest boxes at standardised locations during 2010 and 2011 and conducted fortnightly bird counts (January–October 2009–2011). In 2011 we added two extra plots of each forest type, where we also conducted bird counts. Prior to adding nest boxes, counts revealed more SCNs in mature than in young forest. Following the addition of nest boxes, the number of SCNs increased significantly in the points with nest boxes in both types of forest. Counts in 2011 confirmed the increase in number of birds due to the addition of nest boxes. Given the likely benefits associated with a richer bird community we propose that, as is routinely done in some countries, forest management programs preserve old tree stumps and add nest boxes to forest plantations in order to increase bird numbers and bird community diversity.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Hong CHANG ◽  
Baowen LIAO ◽  
Juan SU ◽  
Guoping ZHANG ◽  
Wei GUAN

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse F. Abrams ◽  
Rahel Sollmann ◽  
Simon L. Mitchell ◽  
Matthew J. Struebig ◽  
Andreas Wilting

AbstractMeasuring the multidimensional diversity properties of a community is of great importance for ecologists, conservationists and stakeholders. Diversity profiles, a plotted series of Hill numbers, simultaneously capture all the common diversity indices. However, diversity metrics require information on species abundance. They often rely on raw count data without accounting for imperfect and varying detection, although detectability can vary between species and study sites. Hierarchical occupancy models explicitly account for variation in detectability, and Hill numbers have been expanded to allow estimation based on occupancy probability. But agreement between occupancy and abundance-based diversity profiles has not been investigated.Here, we fit community occupancy models to simulated animal communities to explore how well occupancy-based diversity profiles reflect true abundance-based diversity. Because we expect occupancy-based diversity to be overestimated, we further tested a novel occupancy thresholding approach to reduce potential biases in the estimated diversity profiles. Finally, we use empirical data from a megadiverse bird community to present how the framework can be extended to consider trait or phylogeny-based similarity when calculating diversity profiles.The simulation study showed that occupancy-based diversity profiles produced among-community patterns in diversity similar to true abundance diversity profiles, although within-community diversity was overestimated with the exception of richness. While applying an occupancy threshold reduced this positive bias, this resulted in negative bias in species richness estimates and slightly reduced the ability to reproduce true differences among the simulated communities. Application of our approach to a large bird dataset revealed differential diversity patterns in communities of different habitat types. Accounting for phylogenetic and ecological similarities between species reduced diversity and its variability among habitats.Our framework allows investigating the complexity of diversity for incidence data, while accounting for imperfect and varying detection probabilities, as well as species similarities. Visualizing results in the form of diversity profiles facilitates comparison of diversity between sites or across time. Therefore, our extension to the diversity profile framework will be a useful tool for studying and monitoring biodiversity.


Bird Study ◽  
1977 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannu Huhtalo ◽  
Olli Järvinen

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mason Fidino ◽  
Kelvin Limbrick ◽  
John Bender ◽  
Travis Gallo ◽  
Seth B. Magle
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 790-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Pierson ◽  
A. Mortelliti ◽  
P.S. Barton ◽  
P.W. Lane ◽  
D.B. Lindenmayer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document