scholarly journals A unified framework for earthquake sequences and the growth of geological structure in fold-thrust belts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishav Mallick ◽  
Roland Burgmann ◽  
Kaj M. Johnson ◽  
Judith Hubbard
1972 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 1319-1341
Author(s):  
R. M. Hamilton ◽  
B. E. Smith ◽  
F. G. Fischer ◽  
P. J. Papanek

Abstract The underground nuclear explosions BENHAM, PURSE, JORUM, and HANDLEY, detonated on Pahute Mesa, initiated earthquake sequences lasting approximately 70, 10, 20, and 60 days, respectively. Earthquakes of magnitude 2.0 or larger in these sequences numbered 2012, 24, 159, and 231, respectively; earthquake magnitudes were all less than 5. The explosion PIPKIN, also detonated on Pahute Mesa, had no apparent effect on seismicity. Ninety-four per cent of the earthquakes with well-determined focal depths occurred at depths shallower than 5 km, and 95 per cent of the located earthquakes were within 14 km of ground zero of the preceding explosion. There is no evidence for explosion-stimulated earthquake activity extending outside the area of Pahute Mesa. The spatial distribution of earthquakes seems to be largely controlled by geological structure; however, the epicenter distribution can be correlated with observed fault movement only for aftershocks of HANDLEY. Fault-plane solutions indicate predominant dip-slip movement in the northern part of the Pahute Mesa area for aftershocks of BENHAM, JORUM, and HANDLEY. In the southern part, dextral strike-slip movement was found for aftershocks of BENHAM and HANDLEY. The frequency-magnitude relations are similar for earthquakes following BENHAM, PURSE, JORUM, and HANDLEY.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2.5) ◽  
pp. 1-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Conti ◽  
Gianluca Cornamusini ◽  
Luigi Carmignani ◽  
Giancarlo Molli

Author(s):  
R. R. Gabdullin ◽  
O. N. Biryukova ◽  
R. A. Akhmedov

The analysis of geological and geophysical materials in order to study the peculiarities of the geological structure of the Vikulov Formation within the Vodorazdel license area was carried out. The presented factual material makes it possible to characterize the geological structure of the investigated area more informatively and for interpreting of seismic materials. The analysis of geological information (GIS and test results) confirms the approved water–oil contact (WOC) level in the investigated section of the deposit, which makes it possible to recalculate its reserves.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document