A novel BRD4‐LEUTX fusion in a pediatric sarcoma with epithelioid morphology and diffuse S100 expression

Author(s):  
Sabina Barresi ◽  
Isabella Giovannoni ◽  
Sabrina Rossi ◽  
Alessandra Stracuzzi ◽  
Denise Quacquarini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Harrison ◽  
Marguerite T. Parisi ◽  
Barry L. Shulkin
Keyword(s):  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 898-910 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lori Wiener ◽  
Haven Battles ◽  
Donna Bernstein ◽  
Lauren Long ◽  
Joanne Derdak ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4571-4571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura K Schoch ◽  
Ivan Borrello ◽  
Ephraim J. Fuchs ◽  
Javier Bolanos-Meade ◽  
Jeffrey Sean Huo ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Concerns have been raised whether immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the alloBMT setting will result in graft versus host disease (GvHD) and transplant related mortality (TRM). We report our experience with a variety of checkpoint inhibitors used before or after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT). Our series comprises patients who received T cell-replete hematopoietic stem cells from HLA-haploidentical or -matched donors and is limited to those treated with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as primary GvHD prophylaxis. Patient selection: We retrospectively reviewed the records of alloBMT recipients who received PTCy and received checkpoint inhibitor therapy before or after alloBMT. GvHD was assessed using the CIBMTR GVHD index. Results: Eleven patients received checkpoint inhibitor therapy prior to alloBMT: anti-PD-1: Nivolumab n=6, anti-CTLA4: Ipilimumab n=8 (3 patients received both nivolumab and ipilimumab). These patients received a median of 4 (range 1 - 18) cycles of therapy. The median interval from last checkpoint inhibitor treatment to day of transplant was 43 (range 18-302) days. All patients received nonmyeloablative conditioning; 6 received partially mismatched allografts (5 were HLA haploidentical). Four patients developed Grade II aGvHD: Three patients who had received partially mismatched allografts (haplo-2, 9/10 unrelated-1) experienced stage 3 cutaneous GvHD only; one patient who received a 10/10 unrelated donor allograft developed stage 3 cutaneous GvHD with stage 1 liver involvement. Three patients were on immunosuppression when GvHD developed, the fourth patient with cutaneous and liver GvHD had been taken off tacrolimus on day 68 due to concerns of graft failure. GvHD resolved with treatment in each case. None of these patients developed chronic GvHD and none have died [median follow-up of 0.66 (range 0.91 - 2.0) years post alloBMT]. Nine patients received checkpoint therapy following alloBMT: anti-PD-1: Pembrolizumab n = 1, Nivolumab n= 6, anti-CTLA4: Ipilimumab n= 3 (one patient received nivolumab and ipilimumab). Eight patients had received nonmyeloablative conditioning; 5 received haploidentical allografts. Six received treatment for relapse of their hematologic malignancy, 1 for relapsed pediatric sarcoma, and 2 for newly diagnosed lung cancer. The median time to initiation of checkpoint inhibitor therapy was 1.2 (range: 0.8 - 5.8) years post alloBMT. Patients received a median of 5 (range 1 - 24) cycles of therapy. There was 1 case of Grade II aGvHD; stage 3 cutaneous GvHD when DLI from a 10/10 matched unrelated donor was given for relapsed disease after ipilimumab. This resulted in GvHD which was not accompanied by the desired graft-vs-leukemia effect. There were no other cases of acute or chronic GvHD in this group. There were 4 tumor-related deaths: pediatric sarcoma (1), lung cancer (1), and AML (2). The median follow-up for this group is 2 years (range 0.85 - 8.0) post alloBMT. Conclusions: In this small series, the incidence and severity of GvHD seen in patients who received checkpoint inhibitors was similar to that seen in patients treated with PTCy as GvHD prophylaxis without checkpoint inhibitors. GvHD was seen in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors prior to alloBMT, but was generally mild and readily controlled and there were no associated deaths. In patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors after alloBMT, the only case of GvHD occurred after the patient received DLI. We caution that use of checkpoint inhibitors in closer temporal proximity to transplant might well be associated with increased risk of GvHD or severity of GvHD. Disclosures Borrello: WindMIL Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: member of DSMB.


2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javal Sheth ◽  
Anthony Arnoldo ◽  
Yunan Zhong ◽  
Paula Marrano ◽  
Carlos Pereira ◽  
...  

Background NanoString technology is an innovative barcode-based system that requires less tissue than traditional techniques and can test for multiple fusion transcripts in a single reaction. The objective of this study was to determine the utility of NanoString technology in the detection of sarcoma-specific fusion transcripts in pediatric sarcomas. Design Probe pairs for the most common pediatric sarcoma fusion transcripts were designed for the assay. The NanoString assay was used to test 22 specific fusion transcripts in 45 sarcoma samples that had exhibited one of these fusion genes previously by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A mixture of frozen (n = 18), formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue (n = 23), and rapid extract template (n = 4) were used for testing. Results Each of the 22 transcripts tested was detected in at least one of the 45 tumor samples. The results of the NanoString assay were 100% concordant with the previous RT-PCR results for the tumor samples, and the technique was successful using both FFPE and rapid extract method. Conclusion Multiplexed interrogation for sarcoma-specific fusion transcripts using NanoString technology is a reliable approach for molecular diagnosis of pediatric sarcomas and works well with FFPE tissues. Future work will involve validating additional sarcoma fusion transcripts as well as determining the optimal workflow for diagnostic purposes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Susann Kleinsimon ◽  
Jana Rolff ◽  
Sebastian Jäger ◽  
Georg Seifert ◽  
Catharina I. Delebinski

Author(s):  
Jessica Gartrell ◽  
Marcia Mellado-Largarde ◽  
Michael R. Clay ◽  
Armita Bahrami ◽  
Natasha A. Sahr ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chihab Klose ◽  
Susanne Berchtold ◽  
Marina Schmidt ◽  
Julia Beil ◽  
Irina Smirnow ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In pediatric sarcomas, outcomes of established therapies still remain poor, especially due to high-grade resistances to chemotherapeutic compounds. Taking novel biological approaches into account, virotherapy was found to be efficient in many pediatric sarcoma types. Also NK cell therapy was denoted to represent a promising upcoming strategy for pediatric sarcoma patients. We here investigated a combinatorial approach employing oncolytic measles vaccine virotherapeutics (MeV) together with activated human NK cells (or PBMCs). Methods The human sarcoma cell lines A673 and HT1080 were used to evaluate the efficacy of this combinatorial treatment modality. Oncolysis was determined by measuring real-time cell proliferation using the xCELLigence RTCA SP system. Furthermore, expression of receptors on NK cells and the respective ligands on A673 cells was analyzed by flow cytometry. To measure the protein release of activated NK cells a LEGENDplex™ assay was performed. Results Monotherapy with MeV led to a time- and dose-dependent oncolytic reduction of A673 and HT1080 sarcoma tumor cell masses. Concurrently, such MeV infections did not change the expression of NK cell ligands MICA/B, ULBP1, 2, and 3, CD112, and CD155. As shown by real-time proliferation assays, infections of A673 and HT1080 sarcoma cells with MeV followed by co-culture with activated NK cells or PBMCs led to enhanced sarcoma cell destruction when compared to the respective monotherapies. In parallel, this dual therapy resulted in an increased release of granzymes, perforin, and granulysin from NK cells. In contrast, expression of activation and ontogenesis receptors on NK cells was not found to be altered after co-culture with MeV-infected A673 sarcoma cells. Conclusions Taken together, the combined treatment strategy comprising oncolytic MeV and activated NK cells resulted in enhanced oncolysis of A673 and HT1080 cells when compared to the respective monotherapies. In parallel, we observed an increased release of NK cell activation markers upon co-culture with MeV-infected A673 human sarcoma cells. These results support the onset of clinical trials combining oncolytic virotherapy with NK cell based immunotherapies.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elodie Da Costa ◽  
Gregory Armaos ◽  
Simon Jacques-Ricard ◽  
Annie Beaudry ◽  
Noël Raynal.
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document