The Principles of Windmills, Cisterns and Flash Floods: Comments of Tom Cech, Author Principles of Water Resources: History, Development, Management, and Policy John Wiley and Sons, 464 pp ISBN 0471438618 (hardcover) Published 15 June 2002

2004 ◽  
Vol 18 (14) ◽  
pp. 2747-2748
Author(s):  
Tom Cech
Keyword(s):  
Water Resources ◽  
Flash Floods ◽  
Development Management

Baseflow and flash flood models of the ungaged Morgó watershed

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gergely Ámon
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Water Resources ◽  
Finite Volume ◽  
Flash Flood ◽  
Flash Floods ◽  
Transport Infrastructure ◽  
Finite Volume Model ◽  
Volume Model ◽  
Creek Watershed ◽  
Water Resources Engineering

<p><strong>Baseflow and flash flood models of the ungaged Morgó watershed</strong></p><p><strong>Gergely Amon<sup>1</sup> and Katalin Bene<sup>2</sup></strong></p><p><strong><sup>1</sup>Department of Transport Infrastructure and Water Resources Engineering, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary, [email protected] </strong></p><p><strong><sup>2</sup>Department of Transport Infrastructure and Water Resources Engineering, Széchenyi István University, Győr, Hungary, </strong><strong>[email protected]</strong></p><p> </p><p>Abstract: A common feature of steep-sloping watersheds is that there is a significant difference between base flow and flash floods; sometimes two or three orders of magnitude. In Hungary, these streams are usually ungaged or the available flow data is very limited. The Morgó creek watershed, located in northern part of Hungary, features steep terrain, and both urban and natural land use conditions.</p><p>In this paper, different models are applied to evaluate flash floods, and baseflow conditions in the Morgó-creek watershed. High probability baseflows can help to evaluate and monitor the current and future condition and health of the local ecological systems. Modeling flash floods with low probability can help to assess and prevent damage in urban areas.</p><p>Different types of models are required to generate baseflow and flash flood scenarios. For baseflow modelling, a two-dimensional finite element method was used while for flash floods, a finite volume model was applied. Morgó creek has a high peak flow, with a sharply increasing rising limb. As a result, the finite volume model is not sensitive to mesh density. Additionally, the impact of roughness coefficient was less than expected during calibration. The low flow analysis requires a more complex model to account for turbulence; therefore, the Shallow Water equations were used in the finite element model.</p><p>Uncertainty in hydrological model parametrization are a source of significant prediction errors. Monte Carlo simulation was applied to quantify parameter uncertainty on watershed response. The analysis was then used in the hydrodynamic model to assess the final prediction error for baseflow and flash flood conditions. While the hydrodynamic baseflow and flash flood models have different space and time scales, the two model solutions do influence each other. Proper analysis and comparison of the selected scenarios can help to determine an optimal design for the Morgó-creek watershed.</p><p>This work was undertaken as part of a project funded by the EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00017.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document