scholarly journals Interfacial adsorption–insertion mechanism induced by phase boundary toward better aqueous Zn‐ion battery

InfoMat ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lutong Shan ◽  
Yiren Wang ◽  
Shuquan Liang ◽  
Boya Tang ◽  
Yongqiang Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Insertion Mechanism ◽  
Interfacial Adsorption

PARAMAGNETIC TO ANTIFERROMAGNETIC PHASE BOUNDARY OF CoF2 FROM ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENTS

1971 ◽  
Vol 32 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-410-C1-411
Author(s):  
Y. SHAPIRA
Keyword(s):  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Antiferromagnetic Phase ◽  
Ultrasonic Measurements

Two-Phase Boundary Layer of Gas with Solid Particles

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 716-732
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Varaksin
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Solid Particles ◽  
Two Phase

Quantitative component interaction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kie Zuraw
Keyword(s):  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Syntactic Structure ◽  
Component Interaction ◽  
Phonological Rule

This chapter examines the phonological rule of nasal substitution in Tagalog, specifically its rate of application in different constructions. Nasal substitution can occur whenever a prefix that ends in /ŋ/ attaches to a stem beginning with an obstruent, as in /maŋ + bigáj/ → [mamigáj] ‘to distribute’. Different prefixes trigger nasal substitution at different rates. This is similar to cases in which word-internal syntactic structure determines how and whether a phonological rule applies (e.g. Newell and Piggott 2014), but different because none of these words’ syntactic structure absolutely prevents nasal substitution, such as by placing a phase boundary between the prefix and stem. The focus of the chapter is on laying out the data, but it does suggest three possible interpretations: variable syntactic structure, a phonology directly sensitive to prefix identity, or competition between productive syntactic structure and lexicalized pronunciation.

Anisotropy of Piezoelectricity near Morphotropic Phase Boundary in Perovskite-Type Oxide Ferroelectrics

2002 ◽  
Vol 266 (1) ◽  
pp. 393-407
Author(s):  
Makoto Iwata ◽  
Hiroshi Orihara ◽  
Yoshihiro Ishibashi
Keyword(s):  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Morphotropic Phase Boundary ◽  
Perovskite Type Oxide ◽  
Perovskite Type

The antiferroelectric phase boundary as a kink

1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Dec ◽  
V. E. Yurkevich
Keyword(s):  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Antiferroelectric Phase

Measurement and finite element modeling of triple phase boundary-related current constriction in YSZ

2007 ◽  
Vol 178 (13-14) ◽  
pp. 915-923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua L. Hertz ◽  
Harry L. Tuller
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Finite Element Modeling ◽  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Triple Phase Boundary ◽  
Element Modeling

scholarly journals The Motion of Multiple-Phase Junctions under Prescribed Phase-Boundary Velocities

1995 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.E. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Multiple Phase

Enhanced energy storage properties at phase boundary in Fe‐doped Ba(Zr0.04Ti0.96)O3 ceramics with a slush polar state

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Fang ◽  
Yucong Zhang ◽  
Chen Wu ◽  
Changyi Liu ◽  
Wenwei Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Energy Storage ◽  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Polar State ◽  
Energy Storage Properties ◽  
Storage Properties

scholarly journals Composition equivalents of stainless steels understood via gamma stabilizing efficiency

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuqi Zhang ◽  
Qing Wang ◽  
Rui Yang ◽  
Chuang Dong
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Phase Boundary ◽  
Stainless Steels ◽  
Alloying Elements ◽  
Positive Sign ◽  
Equivalent Scheme ◽  
Α Phase ◽  
Phase Type ◽  
Boundary Lines

AbstractThe phase-type of a stainless steel is generally predicted by equivalent equations in terms of a major austenitic (γ) or ferritic (α) stabilizer Ni or Cr. The present paper attempts to understand the equivalent methods in stainless steels via the slopes of the phase boundary lines separating γ and γ + α phase zones. The prevailing equivalent coefficients are well interpreted using the slope ratios of the alloying elements divided by that of Ni or Cr, after analyzing over one hundred common stainless steels. Different from traditional composition equivalents which evaluate γ stabilizers and α stabilizers separately; the new equivalent scheme provides a unified phase stabilizing parameter for all alloying elements in stainless steels. This parameter is defined as γ stabilizing efficiency. Its negative or positive sign indicates γ stabilizer or α stabilizer, and its value represents the stabilizing efficiency.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document