scholarly journals Stationary planetary wave and nonmigrating tidal signatures in ionospheric wave 3 and wave 4 variations in 2007-2011 FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC observations

2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (10) ◽  
pp. 6651-6665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Loren C. Chang ◽  
Chien-Hung Lin ◽  
Jia Yue ◽  
Jann-Yenq Liu ◽  
Jia-Ting Lin
Keyword(s):  
Planetary Wave ◽  
Ionospheric Wave ◽  
Stationary Planetary Wave

Relationship between stationary planetary wave activity and the East Asian winter monsoon

2005 ◽  
Vol 110 (D14) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen Chen ◽  
Song Yang ◽  
Rong-Hui Huang
Keyword(s):  
Planetary Wave ◽  
East Asian Winter Monsoon ◽  
East Asian ◽  
Wave Activity ◽  
Winter Monsoon ◽  
Asian Winter Monsoon ◽  
Stationary Planetary Wave

Comparison of Key Characteristics of Remarkable SSW Events in the Southern and Northern Hemisphere

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Kozubek ◽  
Peter Krizan
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Planetary Wave ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Wave Number ◽  
Strong Activity ◽  
Key Characteristics ◽  
Zonal Wave Number ◽  
Show Difference ◽  
Temperature Enhancement ◽  
Stationary Planetary Wave

<p>An exceptionally strong sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) during September 2019 was observed. Because SSW in the SH is very rare, comparison with the only recorded major SH SSW is done. According to World Meteorological Organization (WMO) definition, the SSW in 2019 has to be classified as minor. The cause of SSW in 2002 was very strong activity of stationary planetary wave with zonal wave-number (ZW) 2, which reached its maximum when the polar vortex split into two circulations with polar temperature enhancement by 30 K/week and it penetrated deeply to the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere. On the other hand, the minor SSW in 2019 involved an exceptionally strong wave-1 planetary wave and a large polar temperature enhancement by 50.8 K/week, but it affected mainly the middle and upper stratosphere. The strongest SSW in the Northern Hemisphere was observed in 2009. This study provides comparison of two strongest SSW in the SH and the strongest SSW in the NH to show difference between two hemispheres and possible impact to the lower or higher layers.</p>

Stationary planetary wave dynamics

2012 ◽  
pp. 309-349
Author(s):  
Mankin Mak
Keyword(s):  
Planetary Wave ◽  
Wave Dynamics ◽  
Stationary Planetary Wave

Interannual variability of the nonmigrating semidiurnal tide at high latitudes and stationary planetary wave in the opposite hemispheres

2014 ◽  
Vol 110-111 ◽  
pp. 37-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Iimura ◽  
D.C. Fritts ◽  
R.S. Lieberman ◽  
Q. Wu ◽  
W.R. Skinner
Keyword(s):  
Interannual Variability ◽  
Planetary Wave ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Semidiurnal Tide ◽  
Stationary Planetary Wave

scholarly journals Comparison of Key Characteristics of Remarkable SSW Events in the Southern and Northern Hemisphere

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1063
Author(s):  
Michal Kozubek ◽  
Jan Lastovicka ◽  
Peter Krizan
Keyword(s):  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Planetary Wave ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Wave Number ◽  
Strong Activity ◽  
Key Characteristics ◽  
Zonal Wave Number ◽  
Show Difference ◽  
Temperature Enhancement ◽  
Stationary Planetary Wave

An exceptionally strong sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) during September 2019 was observed. Because SSW in the SH is very rare, comparison with the only recorded major SH SSW is done. According to World Meteorological Organization (WMO) definition, the SSW in 2019 has to be classified as minor. The cause of SSW in 2002 was very strong activity of stationary planetary wave with zonal wave-number (ZW) 2, which reached its maximum when the polar vortex split into two circulations with polar temperature enhancement by 30 K/week and it penetrated deeply to the lower stratosphere and upper troposphere. On the other hand, the minor SSW in 2019 involved an exceptionally strong wave-1 planetary wave and a large polar temperature enhancement by 50.8 K/week, but it affected mainly the middle and upper stratosphere. The strongest SSW in the Northern Hemisphere was observed in 2009. This study provides comparison of two strongest SSW in the SH and the strongest SSW in the NH to show difference between two hemispheres and possible impact to the lower or higher layers.

scholarly journals On the origin of the mesospheric quasi-stationary planetary waves in the unusual Arctic winter 2015/2016

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 4803-4815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivien Matthias ◽  
Manfred Ern
Keyword(s):  
Planetary Wave ◽  
Polar Night ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Model Studies ◽  
Broadband Emission ◽  
Variable Gravity ◽  
Stationary Planetary Wave ◽  
Second Period ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Abstract. The midwinter 2015/2016 was characterized by an unusually strong polar night jet (PNJ) and extraordinarily large stationary planetary wave (SPW) amplitudes in the subtropical mesosphere. The aim of this study is, therefore, to find the origin of these mesospheric SPWs in the midwinter 2015/2016 study period. The study duration is split into two periods: the first period runs from late December 2015 until early January 2016 (Period I), and the second period from early January until mid-January 2016 (Period II). While the SPW 1 dominates in the subtropical mesosphere in Period I, it is the SPW 2 that dominates in Period II. There are three possibilities explaining how SPWs can occur in the mesosphere: (1) they propagate upward from the stratosphere, (2) they are generated in situ by longitudinally variable gravity wave (GW) drag, or (3) they are generated in situ by barotropic and/or baroclinic instabilities. Using global satellite observations from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) and the Sounding of the Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry (SABER) the origin of the mesospheric SPWs is investigated for both time periods. We find that due to the strong PNJ the SPWs were not able to propagate upward into the mesosphere northward of 50∘ N but were deflected upward and equatorward into the subtropical mesosphere. We show that the SPWs observed in the subtropical mesosphere are the same SPWs as in the mid-latitudinal stratosphere. Simultaneously, we find evidence that the mesospheric SPWs in polar latitudes were generated in situ by longitudinally variable GW drag and that there is a mixture of in situ generation by longitudinally variable GW drag and by instabilities at mid-latitudes. Our results, based on observations, show that the abovementioned three mechanisms can act at the same time which confirms earlier model studies. Additionally, the possible contribution from, or impact of, unusually strong SPWs in the subtropical mesosphere to the disruption of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) in the same winter is discussed.

scholarly journals Migrating and Non-Migrating Tides Observed in the Stratosphere from FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC Temperature Retrievals

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uma Das ◽  
William Ward ◽  
Chen Jeih Pan ◽  
Sanat Kumar Das
Keyword(s):  
Planetary Wave ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tidal Variability ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Stationary Planetary Wave ◽  
Linear Interactions ◽  
Winter Hemisphere

Abstract. FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC temperature data during 2009 to 2010 are analysed for tides in the middle atmosphere from ~ 10 to 50 km. COSMIC is a set of six micro satellites in near sun synchronous orbits with 30° orbital separations and provides good phase space sampling of tides. Short term tidal variability is deduced by considering ± 10 days' data together. The DW1 tide is found to peak over the equator at 30 km. It maximises and slightly shifts poleward during winters and thus is attributed to ozone absorption. Over mid and high latitudes, DW1 and the non-migrating tides DS0 and DW2 are intermittent in nature. Numerical experiments in the current study show that these could be a result of aliasing as they are found to occur at times of steep rise or fall in the mean temperature, particularly during the SSW of 2010. Further, stationary planetary wave components are found to be of very large amplitudes in the northern hemispheres reaching 18 K at 30 km over 65° N. By using data from COSMIC over shorter durations, aliasing between SPW and non-migrating tides is reduced and thus results in the large amplitudes of the former. This study clearly indicates that non-linear interactions are not a very important source of generation of the non migrating tides in the high latitude winter hemisphere. There is also a modulation of SPW1 by ~ 60 days in the high latitudes, which was not seen earlier.

scholarly journals Migrating and non-migrating tides observed in the stratosphere from FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC temperature retrievals

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uma Das ◽  
William E. Ward ◽  
Chen Jeih Pan ◽  
Sanat Kumar Das
Keyword(s):  
Planetary Wave ◽  
Middle Atmosphere ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Sudden Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Short Term ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tidal Variability ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Stationary Planetary Wave ◽  
Linear Interactions

Abstract. Formosa Satellite-3 and Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere and Climate (FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC) temperature data during October 2009–December 2010 are analysed for tides in the middle atmosphere from ∼10 to 50 km. COSMIC is a set of six micro-satellites in near-Sun-synchronous orbits with 30∘ orbital separations that provides good phase space sampling of tides. Short-term tidal variability is deduced by considering ±10 d data together. The migrating diurnal (DW1) tide is found to peak over the Equator at 30 km. It maximises and slightly shifts poleward during winters. Over middle and high latitudes, DW1 and the non-migrating diurnal tides with wavenumber 0 (DS0) and wavenumber 2 (DW2) are intermittent in nature. Numerical experiments in the current study show that these could be a result of aliasing as they are found to occur at times of a steep rise or fall in the mean temperature, particularly during the sudden stratospheric warming (SSW) of 2010. Further, the stationary planetary wave component of wavenumber 1 (SPW1) is found to be of very large amplitudes in the Northern Hemisphere, reaching 18 K at 30 km over 65∘ N. By using data from COSMIC over shorter durations, it is shown that aliasing between stationary planetary wave and non-migrating tides is reduced and thus results in the large amplitudes of the former. This study clearly indicates that non-linear interactions are not a very important source for the generation of non-migrating tides in the middle- and high-latitude winter stratosphere. There is also a modulation of SPW1 by a ∼60 d oscillation in the high latitudes, which was not seen earlier.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document