Biomechanical analysis of limited intercarpal fusion for the treatment of Kienböck's disease: A three-dimensional theoretical study

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norimasa Iwasaki ◽  
Eiichi Genda ◽  
Peter J. Barrance ◽  
Akio Minami ◽  
Kiyoshi Kaneda ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110318
Author(s):  
Amelia C. Van Handel ◽  
Leigha M. Lynch ◽  
Jimmy H. Daruwalla ◽  
James P. Higgins ◽  
Kari L. Allen ◽  
...  

Surgical options for advanced Kienböck’s disease include proximal row carpectomy or lunate reconstruction with a medial femoral trochlea osteochondral flap. This study compares morphology of the proximal capitate and the medial femoral trochlear surfaces to the proximal lunate using three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis. Virtual articular surfaces were extracted from MRI studies of ten healthy volunteers. Distances between corresponding points on the proximal lunate and proximal capitate or medial femoral trochlear surfaces were measured. In seven subjects, mean inter-surface distance for the medial femoral trochlea–proximal lunate pair was significantly lower than the proximal capitate–proximal lunate pairing. In three subjects, mean proximal capitate–proximal lunate distance was significantly lower. We conclude that the medial femoral trochlear flap was anatomically closer to the shape of the proximal lunate in the majority of the examined subjects. However, we found that in three out of ten cases, the proximal capitate was a better match.


1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norimasa Iwasaki ◽  
Eiichi Genda ◽  
Akio Minami ◽  
Kiyoshi Kaneda ◽  
Edmund Y.S. Chao

1993 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 686-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Watanabe ◽  
Ryogo Nakamura ◽  
Emiko Horii ◽  
Takayuki Miura

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall W. Viola ◽  
Patti K. Kiser ◽  
Allen W. Bach ◽  
Douglas P. Hanel ◽  
Allan F. Tencer

2002 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Kam ◽  
Steven M. Topper ◽  
Sean McLoughlin ◽  
Qi Liu

Hand Surgery ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 101-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Nakamura ◽  
M. Beppu ◽  
K. Matsushita ◽  
T. Arai ◽  
T. Ide

Two types of lunate were recognized in the midcarpal joint. Type I lunate has no facet articulation with the hamate, and Type II lunate has a facet articulation with the hamate. The purposes of this study are to estimate the biomechanical contribution of Type II lunate for Kienböck's disease, and to elucidate the change of the contact surface between the lunate and hamate during radial and ulnar deviation for both Type I and Type II. Twenty-four contralateral unaffected wrists with Kienböck's disease were used for the first purpose. The radiographic force analysis was performed with a modified two-dimensional rigid-body spring model computer-simulation technique. Six wrists of volunteers (3 of Type I and 3 of Type II lunates) were used for the second purpose. Dynamic examination on lunohamate joint was carried out using magnetic resonance imaging. The force distribution between the radius and Type II lunate was greater than that between the radius and Type I lunate statistically. Furthermore, the impingement of articular cartilages between Type II lunate and hamate was observed in ulnar deviation on dynamic study. These results suggest that Type II lunate was one of the anatomical risk factors for Kienböck's disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document