pH-assisted homogeneous liquid-liquid microextraction using dialkylphosphoric acid as an extraction solvent for the determination of chlorophenols in water samples

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (11) ◽  
pp. 1343-1351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Çabuk ◽  
Mustafa Köktürk ◽  
Şevket Ata
Keyword(s):  
Water Samples ◽  
Homogeneous Liquid ◽  
Extraction Solvent ◽  
Liquid Microextraction

scholarly journals Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and liquid chromatographic determination of pentachlorophenol in water

2009 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalil Farhadi ◽  
Mir Farajzadeh ◽  
Amir Matin ◽  
Paria Hashemi
Keyword(s):  
Water Samples ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Chromatographic Determination ◽  
Extraction Solvent ◽  
Wide Linear Dynamic Range ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic Determination ◽  
Dispersive Liquid Liquid Microextraction ◽  
Liquid Chromatographic ◽  
Liquid Microextraction

AbstractA simple and sensitive dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method for extraction and preconcentration of pentachlorophenol (PCP) in water samples is presented. After adjusting the sample pH to 3, extraction was performed in the presence of 1% W/V sodium chloride by injecting 1 mL acetone as disperser solvent containing 15 μL tetrachloroethylene as extraction solvent. The proposed DLLME method was followed by HPLC-DAD for determination of PCP. It has good linearity (0.994) with wide linear dynamic range (0.1–1000 μg L−1) and low detection limit (0.03 μg L−1), which makes it suitable for determination of PCP in water samples.

Dispersive Liquid-Liquid Microextraction Coupled with Gas Chromatography for the Determination of Orthochlorophenol in Environmental Water Samples

2012 ◽  
Vol 518-523 ◽  
pp. 1379-1382
Author(s):  
Ying Chun Yang ◽  
Qian Sun ◽  
Chong Shu Yi ◽  
Zhi Xiang Ye ◽  
Li Mo
Keyword(s):  
Gas Chromatography ◽  
Water Samples ◽  
Environmental Water ◽  
Environmental Water Samples ◽  
Extraction Solvent ◽  
Salt Addition ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Dispersive Liquid Liquid Microextraction ◽  
Liquid Microextraction

A rapid and effective method, the dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction(DLLME) with gas chromatography, has been developed for the extraction and determination of OCP in environmental water samples. The factors relevant to the efficiency of DLLME were investigated and optimized. Under the optimum conditions, such as 150μL of dichloromethane as extraction solvent, 1.2 mL acetone as dispersive agent, 8 minutes extraction time, and without salt addition, the linear response of this method was in the range of 0.5～5000μg L−1 (r = 0.9981), the relative standard deviation (RSD) for 500μg L−1 and 1000μg L−1 of OCP was 5.2% and 12.6% (n = 6), respectively. The detection limit (3σ) was 0.08 μg L−1. The developed method was successfully applied to the determination of trace amount of OCP in three kinds of real environmental water samples, the spiked recoveries were in the range of 87.4%～108.0%.

Study on the determination of heavy metals in water samples with ultrasound-assisted dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction prior to FAAS

2013 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zonghao Li ◽  
Gong Yu ◽  
Jun Song ◽  
Qi Wang ◽  
Mousheng Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Samples ◽  
Absorption Spectrometry ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Ionic Surfactant ◽  
Extraction Solvent ◽  
Flame Atomic Absorption ◽  
Relative Standard ◽  
Dispersive Liquid Liquid Microextraction ◽  
Liquid Microextraction

A new, simple and rapid method based on dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) was developed for extracting and preconcentrating copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) in water samples prior to flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) analysis. 1-(2-thiazolylazo)-naphthol (TAN) was used as chelating reagents, and non-ionic surfactant Triton X-114 and CCl4 as disperser solvent and extraction solvent, respectively. Some influential factors relevant to DLLME, such as the concentration of TAN, type and volume of disperser and extraction solvent, pH and ultrasound time, were optimized. Under the optimal conditions, the calibration curve was linear in the range of 10–800 μg L−1 for Cu and Ni, 10–500 μg L−1 for Pb, and 10–1,000 μg L−1 for Cd, respectively. The limits of detection for the four metal ions were below 0.5 μg L−1, with the enhancement factors of 105, 66, 28 and 106 for Cu, Ni, Pb and Cd, respectively. The relative standard deviations (RSD, n = 6) were 2.6–4.1%. The proposed method was applied to determination of Cu, Ni, Pb and Cd in water samples and satisfactory relative recoveries (93.0–101.2%) were achieved.

Development of a preconcentration method for indomethacin in natural waters using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on solidification of floating organic drop technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nesrin Topaç ◽  
Cennet Karadaş ◽  
Derya Kara
Keyword(s):  
Water Samples ◽  
Natural Waters ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Tap Water ◽  
Chloride Concentration ◽  
Extraction Solvent ◽  
Dispersive Liquid Liquid Microextraction ◽  
Preconcentration Method ◽  
Liquid Microextraction

Abstract A new dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method based on the solidification of a floating organic drop was developed for the preconcentration of indomethacin in natural waters followed by ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometric detection. 1-undecanol and ethanol were used as the extraction solvent and the disperser solvent, respectively. An investigation of the main experimental parameters that may affect the extraction efficiency, such as sample pH, volume of extraction and disperser solvents, sodium chloride concentration and centrifugation time was undertaken. The effect of interfering ions on the recovery of indomethacin was also examined. Under optimal conditions without any preconcentration, the limit of detection was 17.9 μg/L calculated from LOD = 3 Sb/m and was also calculated as 74.9 μg/L from the regression values of the calibration line using 3.19 Se/m. The proposed preconcentration method was successfully applied to determination of indomethacin in spiked tap water and river water samples. The recovery values for spikes added to water samples were between 94.5 and 103.0%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document