scholarly journals How larval traits of six flatfish species impact connectivity

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 1150-1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Léo Barbut ◽  
Clara Groot Crego ◽  
Sophie Delerue‐Ricard ◽  
Sara Vandamme ◽  
Filip A. M. Volckaert ◽  
...  

In the large body of literature on ecological and evolutionary mechanisms underlying transitions between planktotrophy and lecithotrophy, the focus has typically covered long evolutionary timescales; that is, evolution of complex larval traits is generally discussed in the context of phylogenetic patterns detectable at the level of families, classes, or phyla. An analytical approach incorporating comparative phylogenetics is increasingly used to address these long-view questions. Here, we discuss what has been learned from taking a comparative phylogenetic approach and the limitations of this approach. We propose that approaches based on a closer view—that is, analyses that focus on genetic, morphological, and functional variation among individuals, populations, or closely related congeners—have greater potential to answer questions about mechanisms underlying the loss and regain of major complex characters such as feeding larvae.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenming Lü ◽  
Li Gong ◽  
Yandong Ren ◽  
Yongjiu Chen ◽  
Zhongkai Wang ◽  
...  

AbstractThe evolutionary and genetic origins of the specialized body plan of flatfish are largely unclear. We analyzed the genomes of 11 flatfish species representing 9 of the 14 Pleuronectiforme families and conclude that Pleuronectoidei and Psettodoidei do not form a monophyletic group, suggesting independent origins from different percoid ancestors. Genomic and transcriptomic data indicate that genes related to WNT and retinoic acid pathways, hampered musculature and reduced lipids might have functioned in the evolution of the specialized body plan of Pleuronectoidei. Evolution of Psettodoidei involved similar but not identical genes. Our work provides valuable resources and insights for understanding the genetic origins of the unusual body plan of flatfishes.


Food Control ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 297-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Paracchini ◽  
Mauro Petrillo ◽  
Antoon Lievens ◽  
Antonio Puertas Gallardo ◽  
Jann Thorsten Martinsohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
D.J. Beare ◽  
P.G. Moore

Thirteen species of Amphipoda have been recorded from the stomachs of plaice and 11 species from dabs, with Perioculodes longimanus the most notable prey oedicerotid in both flatfish species sampled from the shallow sublittoral zone (<-6 m depth) at Kames Bay, Millport. Plaice took mostly bivalve siphon tips (Angulus sp.). Polychaetes were more numerous in larger plaice. Sand gobies specialized on small crustaceans, taking 13 amphipod species inter alia (with P. longimanus again the most notable oedicerotid). Amphipod numbers in sand goby stomachs increased with the length of the fish. Neither dabs nor sand gobies consumed bivalve siphon tips and only rarely consumed polychaetes. Although amphipods formed only a minor part of the diet of plaice, at the population density known for this species in this bay, its depredations would still constitute an important selective agency governing patterns of activity in epibenthic oedicerotids.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 400-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claus Reedtz Sparrevohn ◽  
Martin Lindegren ◽  
Brian R. Mackenzie

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document