scholarly journals Gene therapy: Lessons learned from liver transplantation for transthyretin-amyloidosis

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1551-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole B. Suhr ◽  
G�sta Holmgren ◽  
Erik Lundgren
2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Györi ◽  
R Schwarzer ◽  
F Langer ◽  
A Püspök ◽  
M Peck-Radosavljevic ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 428-430
Author(s):  
Soon H. Choi ◽  
John F. Engelhardt

2008 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgios C. Sotiropoulos ◽  
Hauke Lang ◽  
George Sgourakis ◽  
Silvio Nadalin ◽  
Ernesto P. Molmenti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valeria Graceffa

: Although cross-correction was discovered more than 50 years ago, and held the promise of drastically improving disease management, still no cure exists for lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs). Cell therapies hold the potential to halt disease progression: either a subset of autologous cells can be ex vivo/ in vivo transfected with the functional gene or allogenic wild type stem cells can be transplanted. However, majority of cell-based attempts have been ineffective, due to the difficulties in reversing neuronal symptomatology, in finding appropriate gene transfection approaches, in inducing immune tolerance, reducing the risk of graft versus host disease (GVHD) when allogenic cells are used and that of immune response when engineered viruses are administered, coupled with a limited secretion and uptake of some enzymes. In the last decade, due to advances in our understanding of lysosomal biology and mechanisms of cross-correction, coupled with progresses in gene therapy, ongoing pre-clinical and clinical investigations have remarkably increased. Even gene editing approaches are currently under clinical experimentation. This review proposes to critically discuss and compare trends and advances in cell-based and gene therapy for LSDs. Systemic gene delivery and transplantation of allogenic stem cells will be initially discussed, whereas proposed brain targeting methods will be then critically outlined.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Socie ◽  
A B Benmalek ◽  
A L Lallemand ◽  
C C Cauquil ◽  
F R Rouzet ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction By stabilizing transthyretin tetramer, tafamidis delays neurological progression in mutated Transthyretin amyloidosis (mATTR) and has replaced liver transplantation (LT) as the first-line therapy in European patients with stage I mATTR. To date, no study compared these two therapeutic strategies. Material and methods Stage I mATTR patients treated either with tafamidis or with LT were compared using a propensity score. The primary endpoint was the all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were the neurological progression (assessed by a worsening in the PND score) and the cardiac progression of mATTR (defined by a cardiovascular death or the onset or the worsening of symptomatic heart failure). Results The files of 345 patients with proven mATTR were analyzed and 144 patients entered the final analysis (72 patients in each group, median age 54 years, 60% carrying the V30M mutation). Patients treated by tafamidis had a better survival than patients with LT (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.17–0.91; P=0.029). Conversely, the worsening-free survival of the neurological status was significantly shorter for patients that received tafamidis than for LT patients (HR: 6.08; 95% CI: 2.97–12.45; P<0.0001). A similar non-significant trend was documented regarding the progression of the cardiac status (HR: 1.99; 95CI: 0.91–4.34; P=0.084). Conclusions In mATTR, first-line therapy with tafamidis was associated with a better survival than LT. Conversely, LT provided better neurological stabilization than tafamidis. These results confirm that LT remains a major treatment in mATTR. In patients treated with tafamidis, close follow up of the treatment efficacy is mandatory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document