New experimental flap model in the rat: Free flow-through epigastric flap

Microsurgery ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 454-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ömer Özkan ◽  
O. Koray Coşkunfirat ◽  
H. Ege Özgentaş ◽  
M. Bahadir Dikici
2019 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 670-675
Author(s):  
Xiaoju Zheng ◽  
Yi Zhan ◽  
Haijun Li ◽  
Zhong Zhang ◽  
Xuewen Xue ◽  
...  

1969 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 1573 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Rotenberg
Keyword(s):  

1976 ◽  
Vol 190 (1) ◽  
pp. 349-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. I. Ward Smith

SYNOPSIS The pressure losses arising from the flow through internal flow systems are usually estimated by subdividing the system into elementary components, assigning a loss to each component, and then summing these individual contributions. This approach can lead to appreciable errors when the components are sufficiently close to one another for interactions to occur. As a contribution to the discussion of this complicated subject, this paper is concerned with the steady, turbulent flow through combinations of bends and diffusers. Under some circumstances the combined losses of the interacting components are greater than the sum of the individual losses in interference free flow. In other circumstances the reverse is the case. However, as this paper demonstrates, in all cases it is possible to produce sound physical reasons for the variations and, as a consequence, it is possible to generalise the results to interactions involving other components in combination. The paper concludes with a list of broad design principles which have wide application to systems in which interaction effects are important.


2021 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-28
Author(s):  
Anna Sosnowska

Abstract In this paper, flow through a free triangular orifice is considered. The comparison of two formulas was conducted for discharge calculations: a large orifice formula and a small orifice formula. The results show that, above a certain value of upstream head to orifice height ratio there is no need for small-large formula discrimination. The differences in the outcomes for the two formulas are negligible for upstream head to orifice height ratios greater than 3. This means that a small orifice formula can be used instead of a large orifice formula. Calculations were performed for different variants of triangle orientation (with tip downwards, sidewards and upwards) as well as for different dimensions of orifice (equilateral and isosceles). The calculations also included different submergence levels of the upper edge of the orifice and variable dimensions of the orifice with constant upstream head. Neither of these conditions affect the relative deviation values for small and large orifice formulas.


Microsurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 485-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shimpei Miyamoto ◽  
Masahide Fujiki ◽  
Fumihiko Nakatani ◽  
Masanobu Sakisaka ◽  
Minoru Sakuraba

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document