scholarly journals Impact of Home Parenteral Nutrition on Quality of Life in Cancer Patients: Don't Throw the Baby Out With the Bath Water

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Cotogni
2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17591-e17591
Author(s):  
Pankaj G. Vashi ◽  
Sadie Dahlk ◽  
Brenten Popiel ◽  
Carolyn Lammersfeld ◽  
Carol Ireton-Jones ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. BOZZETTI ◽  
LUCA COZZAGLIO ◽  
E. BIGANZOLI ◽  
G. CHIAVENNA ◽  
M. DE CICCO ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 1799-1806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Cotogni ◽  
Luca De Carli ◽  
Roberto Passera ◽  
Maria Luisa Amerio ◽  
Elena Agnello ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Bozzetti ◽  
L Cozzaglio ◽  
E Biganzoli ◽  
G Chiavenna ◽  
M De Cicco ◽  
...  

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2357
Author(s):  
Marina Plyta ◽  
Pinal S. Patel ◽  
Konstantinos C. Fragkos ◽  
Tomoko Kumagai ◽  
Shameer Mehta ◽  
...  

(1) Background: Malnutrition in cancer patients impacts quality of life (QoL) and performance status (PS). When oral/enteral nutrition is not possible and patients develop intestinal failure, parenteral nutrition (PN) is indicated. Our aim was to assess nutritional status, QoL, and PS in hospitalised cancer patients recently initiated on PN for intestinal failure. (2) Methods: The design was a cross-sectional observational study. The following information was captured: demographic, anthropometric, biochemical and medical information, as well as nutritional screening tool (NST), patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA), functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G), and Karnofsky PS (KPS) data. (3) Results: Among 85 PN referrals, 30 oncology patients (56.2 years, 56.7% male) were identified. Mean weight (60.3 ± 16.6 kg) corresponded to normal body mass index values (21.0 ± 5.1 kg/m2). However, weight loss was significant in patients with gastrointestinal tumours (p < 0.01). A high malnutrition risk was present in 53.3–56.7% of patients, depending on the screening tool. Patients had impaired QoL (FACT-G: 26.6 ± 9.8) but PS indicated above average capability with independent daily activities (KPS: 60 ± 10). (4) Conclusions: Future research should assess the impact of impaired NS and QoL on clinical outcomes such as survival, with a view to encompassing nutritional and QoL assessment in the management pathway of this patient group.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document