Prevention and treatment of anticipatory chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in pediatric cancer patients and hematopoietic stem cell recipients: Clinical practice guideline update

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priya Patel ◽  
Paula D. Robinson ◽  
Katie A. Devine ◽  
Karyn Positano ◽  
Marie Cohen ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (27) ◽  
pp. 3205-3216
Author(s):  
Thomas Lehrnbecher ◽  
Brian T. Fisher ◽  
Bob Phillips ◽  
Melissa Beauchemin ◽  
Fabianne Carlesse ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To develop a clinical practice guideline for systemic antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. METHODS Recommendations were developed by an international multidisciplinary panel that included a patient advocate. We conducted a systematic review of systemic antifungal prophylaxis in children and adults with cancer and HSCT recipients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to make strong or weak recommendations and to classify level of evidence as high, moderate, low, or very low. The panel considered directness of the data to pediatric patients. RESULTS There were 68 randomized trials included in the systematic review, of which 6 (9%) were conducted in a solely pediatric population. Strong recommendations were made to administer systemic antifungal prophylaxis to children and adolescents receiving treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, to those undergoing allogeneic HSCT pre-engraftment, and to those receiving systemic immunosuppression for graft-versus-host disease treatment. A strong recommendation was made to administer a mold-active agent with an echinocandin or a mold-active azole when systemic antifungal prophylaxis is warranted. For children younger than 13 years of age, an echinocandin, voriconazole, or itraconazole is suggested. Posaconazole may also be used in those age 13 years or older. A strong recommendation against routine administration of amphotericin as systemic antifungal prophylaxis was made. CONCLUSION We developed a clinical practice guideline for systemic antifungal prophylaxis administration in pediatric patients with cancer and HSCT recipients. Implementation and assessment of guideline-concordant rates and impacts are important future steps.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S605-S606
Author(s):  
Muayad Alali ◽  
Jennifer Pisano

Abstract Background Prolonged and profound neutropenia are risk factors for invasive fungal disease (IFD) during febrile neutropenia (FN) episodes. The D-index combines both depth and duration of neutropenia in a single assessment and has been proposed as a useful tool to exclude or predict IFD in high-risk adult patients. We assessed the D-index as a predictor of IFD in pediatric cancer patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of pediatric oncology patients with FN at UCM Comer Children’s Hospitals. IFD was stratified as possible, probable, and proven according EORTC/MSG criteria. Patients considered high risk of IFD were receiving intensive chemotherapy with expected prolonged neutropenia >7 days, including, but not limited to, AML, high-risk acute ALL, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The D1-index was equal to 2t1 + 3t2, where t1, and t2 are the number of days from the first day of neutropenia < 500mm3 and < 100/ mm3 respectively, until the development of IFD. The D2-index approximates the area over the neutrophil curve during neutropenia. A cumulative D-index (c-D-index) was also calculated using the first day of neutropenia until the date of the first clinical manifestation of IFD. We compared duration of neutropenia vs D-index vs c-D-index as a predictor of IFD using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC)/AUC analysis. Figure 1 Figure 2 Results We identified 455 FN episodes in 203 high-risk patients. 53/455 (11.6%) had IFD, 12 (2.6%) proven, 23 (5%) probable, and 18 (4%) possible. The median of D1, D2 indexes and c-D-index were significantly higher in patients developing IFD (38, 5225, 7352) compared to the non-IFD group (26, 3857, 5169) (P=.001, P=.001, and P=.01) respectively. The ROC curve of D-index and c-D-index (figure 1,2,3) showed better performance (AUC of 0.85,0.89, 0.81) respectively compared to the duration of neutropenia alone. The ROC was highest when D-index was combined with prolonged fever >5 days (AUC 0.94) Figure 3 Figure 4 Conclusion The D-index may be a useful tool to stratify high-risk pediatric patients according to risk of IFD. The c-D-index, particularly, may be a useful tool to guide for empiric antifungal therapy and diagnostic testing. Prospective multi-center studies using these tools are required to refine the clinical approach to IFD. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document