Prenatal Chromosome Microarray:‘The UK experience’. A survey of reporting practices in UK genetic services (2012 to 2019)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Patterson ◽  
Diana Wellesley ◽  
Sian Morgan ◽  
Deirdre Cilliers ◽  
Stephanie Allen ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-46
Author(s):  
H. Kääriäinen


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Slade ◽  
Daniel Riddell ◽  
Clare Turnbull ◽  
Helen Hanson ◽  
Nazneen Rahman ◽  
...  




2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 219-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anneke Lucassen ◽  
Michael Parker


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Klumpes ◽  
C. Ledlie ◽  
F. Fahey ◽  
G. Kakar ◽  
S. Styles

AbstractRecent changes made to the UK Corporate Governance Code require UK firms to report new or enhanced narrative information concerning their principal risks, their risk management processes and their future viability. This paper analyses whether the level and nature of voluntary compliance with these new requirements is consistent with alternative economic and political visibility incentives. We analyse relevant sections of financial reports produced by industry-matched samples of large-, mid- and small-cap UK-listed firms during the transitional 2013–2014 financial reporting years. Both specific and generic readability attributes of the reports are measured. We find that virtually no firm in our sample has provided any viability statement. Empirical analysis of disclosures concerning principal risk assessment and review processes appear to be primarily motivated by political visibility reasons. Examples of particularly good and cases of poor corporate risk reporting practices are also discussed. Possible implications for the actuarial profession are discussed.



Journalism ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 146488492110017
Author(s):  
Mats Ekström ◽  
Marianna Patrona ◽  
Joanna Thornborrow

This paper focuses on the moral work of journalism as displayed and enacted in the reporting practices used in news coverage of scandalous talk by right-wing populist (RWP) politicians. Using a qualitative discourse-analytic approach, we analyze a set of cases of journalistic framing of RWP talk recently circulating in Sweden, Greece, France and the UK, and examine ways in which anti-democratic or racist talk is represented within print, online and broadcast news media. We show how the complex dynamics of different kinds of discursive framing of scandalous talk construct boundaries between right and wrong which contribute to processes of normalising populist discourses and agendas. Moreover, we call attention to the challenge that this poses for contemporary journalism both within public service and commercial networks, as reporting on right-wing populism involves a balancing act between disparate constraints and exigencies of journalism.



Author(s):  
Tony Wall ◽  
Martin McCracken ◽  
Ronan McIvor ◽  
Raymond Treacy


2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 893-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vida Botes ◽  
Rory Diver ◽  
Howard Davey

Museums as custodians of important cultural heritage assets attract significant sponsorship from government and communities and a need exists to understand how the resources made available are being spent, to maintain and increase the value of these assets. The significance placed on museums warrants further investigation into their accountability and the purpose of this paper is to analyse museums reporting practices, as a way to discharge performance accountability. The reporting practices of the world’s leading museums in the USA versus those predominately located in the UK (with a small focus on Europe) were examined, compared and contrasted, in order to suggest better practice for improved accountability in in annual reporting so as assist in improving the governance of museums. To assess the annual reports, a modified version of a research instrument which works in conjunction with the balanced scorecard framework to evaluate performance accountability, namely the Museums’ Performance Accountability Index (MPADI) by Wei, Davey and Coy (2008) has been adopted. Evidence is found that the four perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard were emphasized differently between USA and UK/European institutions. The findings demonstrate areas of strength s but also recommend improved reporting practices for museums. The study draws out a number of detailed observations which offers suggestions for better practice in reporting by museums. Until recently there has been little research on the performance and accountability of this sector. This work assists in addressing this deficiency.



BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e023676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Taylor ◽  
Fiona Jones ◽  
Christopher McKevitt

ObjectivesOccupational therapy, physiotherapy and speech and language therapy are central to rehabilitation after a stroke. The UK has introduced an audited performance target: that 45 min of each therapy should be provided to patients deemed appropriate. We sought to understand how this has influenced delivery of stroke unit therapy.DesignEthnographic study, including observation and interviews. The theoretical framework drew on the work of Lipsky and Power, framing therapists as ‘street level bureaucrats’ in an ‘audit society’.SettingStroke units in three English hospitals.ParticipantsForty-three participants were interviewed, including patients, therapists and other staff.ResultsThere was wide variation in how therapy time was recorded and in decision-making regarding which patients were ‘appropriate for therapy’ or auditable. Therapists interpreted their roles differently in each stroke unit. Therapists doubted the validity of the audit results and did not believe their results reflected the quality of services they provided. Some assumed their audit results would inform commissioning decisions. Senior therapy leaders shaped priorities and practices in each therapy team. Patients were inactive outside therapy sessions. Patients differed regarding the quantity of therapy they felt they needed but consistently wanted to be more involved in decisions and treated as individuals.Conclusions and implicationsStroke unit therapy has different meanings in different hospitals. Measuring therapy time is problematic due to varied interpretations of ‘what counts’ and variation in reporting practices. Although stroke policy, guidelines and audit are potential tools of improvement, their benefits are not automatic. Their actual effects depend largely on the attitudes and values of local influential ‘street level leaders’. More work is needed to promote an integrated whole team approach to rehabilitation. Further research into contextual and human factors, including the roles and views of therapy leaders, would enable a better understanding of implementation of guidelines and service improvement.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document