Exome‐based preconception carrier testing for consanguineous couples in China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi He ◽  
Run‐Gui Xie ◽  
Ji‐Wu Lou ◽  
Yan‐Wei Li ◽  
Chun‐Li Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Suzanne C. E. H. Sallevelt ◽  
Alexander P. A. Stegmann ◽  
Bart de Koning ◽  
Crool Velter ◽  
Anja Steyls ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Consanguineous couples are at increased risk of being heterozygous for the same autosomal recessive (AR) disorder(s), with a 25% risk of affected offspring as a consequence. Until recently, comprehensive preconception carrier testing (PCT) for AR disorders was unavailable in routine diagnostics. Here we developed and implemented such a test in routine clinical care. Methods We performed exome sequencing (ES) for 100 consanguineous couples. For each couple, rare variants that could give rise to biallelic variants in offspring were selected. These variants were subsequently filtered against a gene panel consisting of ~2,000 genes associated with known AR disorders (OMIM-based). Remaining variants were classified according to American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines, after which only likely pathogenic and pathogenic (class IV/V) variants, present in both partners, were reported. Results In 28 of 100 tested consanguineous couples (28%), likely pathogenic and pathogenic variants not previously known in the couple or their family were reported conferring 25% risk of affected offspring. Conclusion ES-based PCT provides a powerful diagnostic tool to identify AR disease carrier status in consanguineous couples. Outcomes provided significant reproductive choices for a higher proportion of these couples than previous tests.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Luke Nussbaum ◽  
Robert Nathan Slotnick ◽  
Neil J. Risch
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Allyn McConkie-Rosell ◽  
Gail A. Spiridigliozzi ◽  
Timothy Iafolla ◽  
Jack Tarleton ◽  
Ave M. Lachiewicz

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Tozzo ◽  
Luciana Caenazzo ◽  
Daniele Rodriguez

Genetic testing in children raises many important ethical, legal, and social issues. One of the main concerns is the ethically inappropriate genetic testing of minors. Various European countries established professional guidelines which reflect the different countries perspectives regarding the main ethical issues involved. In this paper, we analyze the Italian and the British guidelines by highlighting differences and similarities. We discuss presymptomatic, predictive, and carrier testing because we consider them to be the more ethically problematic types of genetic testing in minors. In our opinion, national guidelines should take into account the different needs in clinical practice. At the same time, in the case of genetic testing the national and supranational protection of minors could be strengthened by approving guidelines based on a common framework of principles and values. We suggest that the Oviedo Convention could represent an example of such a common framework or, at least, it could lead to articulate it.


2008 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 370-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Borry ◽  
L Stultiens ◽  
T Goffin ◽  
H Nys ◽  
K Dierickx

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 2092-2095
Author(s):  
Alan F. Rope ◽  
Tia L. Kauffman ◽  
Pat Himes ◽  
Laura M. Amendola ◽  
Sumit Punj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Haemophilia ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-369 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Lee ◽  
C. M. Kessler ◽  
D. Varon ◽  
U. Martinowitz ◽  
M. Heim ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shenaz Ahmed ◽  
Hilary Bekker ◽  
Jenny Hewison ◽  
Sally Kinsey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document