scholarly journals Combining label‐free and label‐based accurate quantifications with SWATH‐MS: comparison with SRM and PRM for the evaluation of bovine muscle type effects

PROTEOMICS ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 2000214
Author(s):  
Joanna Bons ◽  
Gauthier Husson ◽  
Marie Chion ◽  
Muriel Bonnet ◽  
Myriam Maumy‐Bertrand ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Thierry Astruc ◽  
Olivier Loison ◽  
Frédéric Jamme ◽  
Matthieu Réfrégiers ◽  
Annie Vénien

The different bovine muscle fibre types I, IIA and IIX are characterised by their preferred metabolic pathway, either oxidative (I, IIA) or glycolytic (IIX), and their contraction speed, either slow-twitch (I) or fast-twitch (IIA, IIX). These physiological specificities are associated with variations in intracellular composition and their fluorescence spectra signatures. We hypothesised that these slight differences in autofluorescence responses could be used to discriminate the muscle fibre types by fluorescence imaging. Serial histological cross-sections of beef longissimus dorsi were performed: the start set was used to identify the metabolic and contractile type of muscle fibres by both immunohistoenzymology and immunohistofluorescence, and the following set was used to acquire synchrotron–deep ultraviolet (UV) autofluorescence images after excitation in the UV range (275 nm and 315 nm). This strategy made it possible to explore the label-free autofluorescence of muscle cells previously subtyped by histochemistry. Glycolytic cells (IIX) showed more intense fluorescence than oxidative cells (I and IIA) with near-90 % accuracy. This discrimination is more specifically assigned to the fluorescence of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. UV autofluorescence was unable to discriminate contractile type.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (18) ◽  
pp. 22082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robbe Van Beers ◽  
Ben Aernouts ◽  
Marlon M. Reis ◽  
Wouter Saeys

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolas Hundt

Abstract Single-molecule imaging has mostly been restricted to the use of fluorescence labelling as a contrast mechanism due to its superior ability to visualise molecules of interest on top of an overwhelming background of other molecules. Recently, interferometric scattering (iSCAT) microscopy has demonstrated the detection and imaging of single biomolecules based on light scattering without the need for fluorescent labels. Significant improvements in measurement sensitivity combined with a dependence of scattering signal on object size have led to the development of mass photometry, a technique that measures the mass of individual molecules and thereby determines mass distributions of biomolecule samples in solution. The experimental simplicity of mass photometry makes it a powerful tool to analyse biomolecular equilibria quantitatively with low sample consumption within minutes. When used for label-free imaging of reconstituted or cellular systems, the strict size-dependence of the iSCAT signal enables quantitative measurements of processes at size scales reaching from single-molecule observations during complex assembly up to mesoscopic dynamics of cellular components and extracellular protrusions. In this review, I would like to introduce the principles of this emerging imaging technology and discuss examples that show how mass-sensitive iSCAT can be used as a strong complement to other routine techniques in biochemistry.


2003 ◽  
Vol 773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myung-Il Park ◽  
Jonging Hong ◽  
Dae Sung Yoon ◽  
Chong-Ook Park ◽  
Geunbae Im

AbstractThe large optical detection systems that are typically utilized at present may not be able to reach their full potential as portable analysis tools. Accurate, early, and fast diagnosis for many diseases requires the direct detection of biomolecules such as DNA, proteins, and cells. In this research, a glass microchip with integrated microelectrodes has been fabricated, and the performance of electrochemical impedance detection was investigated for the biomolecules. We have used label-free λ-DNA as a sample biomolecule. By changing the distance between microelectrodes, the significant difference between DW and the TE buffer solution is obtained from the impedance-frequency measurements. In addition, the comparison for the impedance magnitude of DW, the TE buffer, and λ-DNA at the same distance was analyzed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-72
Author(s):  
L.A. Kotkas ◽  
◽  
A.S. Donskoj ◽  
A.A. ZHarkovskij ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document