scholarly journals Assessing the impact of cancer among Dutch non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors compared with their American counterparts: a cross-national study

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1258-1265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Oerlemans ◽  
Sophia K. Smith ◽  
Catherine M. Crespi ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
National Study ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cross National Study ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Lymphoma Survivors ◽  
Cross National

scholarly journals Comparison of the impact of cancer between British and US long-term non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 739-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shah-Jalal Sarker ◽  
Sophia K. Smith ◽  
Kashfia Chowdhury ◽  
Patricia A. Ganz ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Lymphoma Survivors

scholarly journals The impact of cancer and quality of life for post-treatment non-Hodgkin lymphoma survivors

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (12) ◽  
pp. 1259-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophia K. Smith ◽  
Catherine M. Crespi ◽  
Laura Petersen ◽  
Sheryl Zimmerman ◽  
Patricia A. Ganz
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Lymphoma Survivors

The Impact of Taxes on Growth and Distribution in Developed Capitalist Countries: A Cross-National Study

1983 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 871-886 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio J. Katz ◽  
Vincent A. Mahler ◽  
Michael G. Franz
Keyword(s):  
Income Distribution ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Income Taxes ◽  
Property Taxes ◽  
National Study ◽  
Corporate Income Taxes ◽  
Cross National Study ◽  
Investment Growth ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cross National

Has the scope of public planning in contemporary capitalist economies promoted or hindered economic growth and income distribution? We explore this question by assessing the impact of various mechanisms for raising government revenues on investment, growth, and income distribution in 22 developed market economy countries. The article considers whether growth and distribution are affected differently by governments' relative reliance on personal and corporate income taxes, social security contributions, property taxes, and sales and value added taxes, or by the relative progressivity of tax mechanisms. Our findings lend support to the assertion that fiscal instruments (especially personal income taxes) can be used successfully to achieve greater income equality. On the other hand, these findings run counter to the conventional notion that an automatic trade-off exists between an active public sector and a dynamic, expanding economy: although there is surely some tension between the economic goals of growth and equality, it is not at all clear that they are necessarily incompatible or that government can contribute only to the latter.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document