Phase III trial of androgen suppression before and during radiation therapy for locally advanced prostatic cancer: Abstract report of RTOG 8610xs

The Prostate ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 25 (S1) ◽  
pp. 2-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1013-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M V Pilepich ◽  
R Caplan ◽  
R W Byhardt ◽  
C A Lawton ◽  
M J Gallagher ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Although androgen suppression results in a tumor response/remission in the majority of patients with carcinoma of the prostate, its potential value as an adjuvant has not been substantiated. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 1987, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) initiated a randomized phase III trial of adjuvant goserelin in definitively irradiated patients with carcinoma of the prostate. A total of 977 patients had been accessioned to the study. Of these, 945 remained analyzable: 477 on the adjuvant arm and 468 on the observation arm. RESULTS Actuarial projections show that at 5 years, 84% of patients on the adjuvant goserelin arm and 71% on the observation arm remain without evidence of local recurrence (P < .0001). The corresponding figures for freedom from distant metastases and disease-free survival are 83% versus 70% (P < .001) and 60% and 44% (P < .0001). If prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level greater than 1.5 ng is included as a failure (after > or = 1 year), the 5-year disease-free survival rate on the adjuvant goserelin arm is 53% versus 20% on the observation arm (P < .0001). The 5-year survival rate (for the entire population) is 75% on the adjuvant arm versus 71% on the observation arm (P = .52). However, in patients with centrally reviewed tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10, the difference in actuarial 5-year survival (66% on the adjuvant goserelin arm v 55% on the observation arm) reaches statistical significance (P = .03). CONCLUSION Application of androgen suppression as an adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy has been associated with a highly significant improvement in local control and freedom from disease progression. At this point, with a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, a significant improvement in survival has been observed only in patients with centrally reviewed tumors with a Gleason score of 8 to 10.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7101-7101 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kiura ◽  
Y. Segawa ◽  
M. Tabata ◽  
N. Takigawa ◽  
H. Kamei ◽  
...  

7101 Background: Standard treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is cisplatin-based chemotherapy with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy (TRT). Furuse et al. demonstrated a superiority of mitomycin, vindesine and cisplatin (MVP) chemotherapy with concurrent TRT over that with sequential TRT (JCO 17, 1999). We demonstrated that docetaxel plus cisplatin (DP) chemotherapy with concurrent TRT shows better response rate and survival (Kiura K et al. BJC 89, 2003). We conducted a randomized phase III trial that compared DP with MVP in locally advanced NSCLC patients when concurrently administered with TRT. Methods: We randomly assigned patients with good performance status (PS)-stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC to receive DP or MVP chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel 40 mg/m2 and cisplatin 40 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29, & 36 in the DP arm and mitomycin 8 mg/m2 on days 1 & 29, vindesine 3 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29, & 36, and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on days 1 & 29 in the MVP arm. In the both groups, TRT began on day 1 at a dose of 60 Gy (2 Gy per fraction and 5 fractions per week for a total of 30 fractions). Results: Two hundred patients entered the trial between July 2000 and July 2005. Pretreatment characteristics were well balanced between the two treatment arms as follows: male/female 92/7, 88/13; median age (range) 65 (40–75), 64 (34–75); stage IIIA/IIIB 33/66, 33/68; and PS of 0/1 46/53, 50/51, for the DP arm and for the MVP arm, respectively. The response rates for the DP arm and the MVP arm were 78.8% and 70.3%, respectively. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 81.8% and 59.9% for the DP arm, and were 68.8% and 49.1% for the MVP arm, respectively. Median follow up time is 1.4 years in January 2006. Complete analysis will be fixed in July 2007. Conclusions: The DP arm is exactly reproducing the response rate and survival of the phase II trial we have previously reported. The MVP arm seems to reveal better results than that we expected. Radiation dose and schedule might explain the difference because Furuse et al. splitted 56 Gy of TRT in the MVP arm whereas we did not split 60 Gy of TRT. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


1988 ◽  
Vol 15 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 182-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Aro ◽  
R. Haapiainen ◽  
M. Kajanti ◽  
S. Rannikko ◽  
O. Alfthan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document