Flux-profile relation with roughness sublayer correction

2014 ◽  
Vol 141 (689) ◽  
pp. 1191-1197 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Arnqvist ◽  
H. Bergström
1999 ◽  
Vol 98-99 ◽  
pp. 645-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meelis Mölder ◽  
Achim Grelle ◽  
Anders Lindroth ◽  
Sven Halldin

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Trowbridge ◽  
James B. Edson ◽  
Wade R. McGillis ◽  
Albert J. Plueddeman ◽  
Eugene A. Terray ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Alexandros Makedonas ◽  
Matteo Carpentieri ◽  
Marco Placidi

AbstractWind-tunnel experiments were carried out on four urban morphologies: two tall canopies with uniform height and two super-tall canopies with a large variation in element heights (where the maximum element height is more than double the average canopy height, $$h_{max}=2.5h_{avg}$$ h max = 2.5 h avg ). The average canopy height and packing density are fixed across the surfaces to $$h_{avg} = 80~\hbox {mm}$$ h avg = 80 mm , and $$\lambda _{p} = 0.44$$ λ p = 0.44 , respectively. A combination of laser Doppler anemometry and direct-drag measurements are used to calculate and scale the mean velocity profiles with the boundary-layer depth $$\delta $$ δ . In the uniform-height experiment, the high packing density results in a ‘skimming flow’ regime with very little flow penetration into the canopy. This leads to a surprisingly shallow roughness sublayer (depth $$\approx 1.15h_{avg}$$ ≈ 1.15 h avg ), and a well-defined inertial sublayer above it. In the heterogeneous-height canopies, despite the same packing density and average height, the flow features are significantly different. The height heterogeneity enhances mixing, thus encouraging deep flow penetration into the canopy. A deeper roughness sublayer is found to exist extending up to just above the tallest element height (corresponding to $$z/h_{avg} = 2.85$$ z / h avg = 2.85 ), which is found to be the dominant length scale controlling the flow behaviour. Results point toward the existence of a constant-stress layer for all surfaces considered herein despite the severity of the surface roughness ($$\delta /h_{avg} = 3 - 6.25$$ δ / h avg = 3 - 6.25 ). This contrasts with the previous literature.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanyu Shi ◽  
Zhibao Dong ◽  
Nan Xiao ◽  
Qinni Huang

2004 ◽  
Vol 109 (C8) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Edson ◽  
C. J. Zappa ◽  
J. A. Ware ◽  
W. R. McGillis ◽  
J. E. Hare
Keyword(s):  

Pramana ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 22 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 159-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
S V Dhurandhar ◽  
C V Vishveshwara

Author(s):  
K. A. Everard ◽  
G. G. Katul ◽  
G. A. Lawrence ◽  
A. Christen ◽  
M. B. Parlange
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document