Methodology and model for performance and cost comparison of innovative treatment technologies at wood preserving sites

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark L. Evans ◽  
Robert E. Porges ◽  
Gunarti H. Coghlan ◽  
Richard G. Eilers ◽  
Art G. Glazer
Keyword(s):  
Cost Comparison ◽  
Innovative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Technologies

The use of innovative treatment technologies at superfund sites

1988 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-191
Author(s):  
for Environmental Management. Center ◽  
Tufts University
Keyword(s):  
Superfund Sites ◽  
Innovative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Technologies

Trends in Innovative Treatment Technologies at Contaminated Sites

1992 ◽  
Vol 26 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. W. Kovalick
Keyword(s):  
Solid Waste ◽  
Emergency Response ◽  
Contaminated Soils ◽  
Contaminated Sites ◽  
Innovative Treatment ◽  
Waste Remediation ◽  
Treatment Technologies ◽  
Conventional Methods ◽  
Economic Considerations

Increasing the diversity of technologies used to remediate contaminated soils and groundwater is one of the goals of EPA's Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER). While conventional methods of waste remediation, such as stabilization, containment, and incineration, are certainly valid approaches to resolving waste problems, statutory and economic considerations are now, more than ever, encouraging the entire remediation community to consider change in thinking and practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document