scholarly journals Structured Reasoning to Support Deliberative Dialogue

2005 ◽  
pp. 283-289
Author(s):  
Alyx Macfadyen ◽  
Andrew Stranieri ◽  
John Yearwood
Keyword(s):  
Deliberative Dialogue

A Deliberative Approach to the Tibet Autonomy Issue

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baogang He
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Understanding ◽  
Mutual Trust ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Deliberative Dialogue

Chapter 10 reviews and compares three deliberative approaches to conflict, and applies the deliberative approach to the Tibet autonomy issue. It examines the case of a deliberative workshop, including its achievements and limitations. This chapter demonstrates that this deliberative dialogue has improved knowledge and mutual understanding, enhanced mutual trust and deliberative capacities, and produced moderating effects.

scholarly journals Codesigning care improvements for women living with HIV: a patient-oriented deliberative dialogue workshop in Montréal, Quebec

CMAJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. E264-E272
Author(s):  
Nadia O’Brien ◽  
Susan Law ◽  
Karène Proulx-Boucher ◽  
Brigitte Ménard ◽  
Lashanda Skerritt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deliberative Dialogue ◽  
Women Living With Hiv ◽  
Living With Hiv

scholarly journals Getting at Equality: Research Methods Informed by the Lessons of Intersectionality

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 160940691984675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Bailey ◽  
Valerie Steeves ◽  
Jacquelyn Burkell ◽  
Leslie Regan Shade ◽  
Rakhi Ruparelia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Young People ◽  
Social Science ◽  
Concept Mapping ◽  
Participatory Action ◽  
Marginalized Communities ◽  
Intersectionality Theory ◽  
Deliberative Dialogue ◽  
Communications Technologies

This article evaluates a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach with mixed methods including concept mapping, q-sorting and deliberative dialogue in the context of a research project on young people’s experiences with digital communications technologies, and addresses some of the central insights of intersectionality theory and praxis. Our approach seeks to ensure that, insofar as possible, the gathered data provide a rich and layered window into the experiences of young people from a range of marginalized communities served by our project partners. The article revisits some key insights and contestations relating to intersectionality and addresses their relationship to our approach. We evaluate whether these methods enhance understandings of the interactions of structures of subordination with other factors identified in intersectionality scholarship, as well as the extent to which they centre the knowledge and expertise of those subordinated by matrices of domination as discussed by authors such as Crenshaw and Hill Collins. Our approach is just one of many that social science researchers interested in advancing intersectionality’s key insights could deploy. While it falls short of full consistency with these insights, its mixed methods work toward our partners’ social justice objectives while facilitating exploration of intersecting axes of subordination. Our approach can also help our project recapture the politic at the heart of many intersectional feminist critiques, such as those of Crenshaw and Hill Collins - that reconceptualizing knowledge requires centring the knowledge and expertise of those traditionally excluded due to interlocking systems of subordination.

Deliberative Dialogue to Expand Civic Engagement: What Kind of Talk Does Democracy Need?

2002 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha L. McCoy ◽  
Patrick L. Scully
Keyword(s):  
Civic Engagement ◽  
Deliberative Dialogue

What Do We Ask of Global Citizenship Education? A Study of Global Citizenship Education in a Canadian University

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynette Shultz
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Deliberative Democracy ◽  
Citizenship Education ◽  
Global Citizenship ◽  
Educational Goal ◽  
Global Citizenship Education ◽  
Deliberative Dialogue ◽  
The World ◽  
Deliberative Processes ◽  
Equity And Inclusion

This article presents findings from a study of a Canadian university that has named 'global citizenship' as a key educational goal. Drawing on theories of globalization, deliberative democracy, and deliberative processes including discursive closure, this study examines the multiple demands made of 'global citizenship' in higher education and the subsequent educational projects that are designed to meet this educational goal. The research questioned whether discursive closure was being engaged to limit 'global citizenship' to a modernity project where, as the literature suggested, (neo) liberalism and universalism ultimately served to make the world the un-gated playground of the elite where they might work, play, and consume without national or local political and cultural restrictions. In contrast, we wondered whether these policy openings might also be reflections of shifts in practices toward justice, equity, and inclusion with considerations of the historical and cultural histories and legacies of international relations of colonialism and imperialism. Using deliberative dialogue as a data collection method, the researchers were able to surface educators' multiple understandings of global citizenship as well as possible discursive closure and/or emerging social justice in the courses, projects, and policies of this institution.

Analyzing Data Generated Through Deliberative Dialogue

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1529-1539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrina M. Plamondon ◽  
Joan L. Bottorff ◽  
Donald C. Cole
Keyword(s):  
Deliberative Dialogue

A Deliberative Approach to the Tibet Autonomy Issue: Promoting Mutual Trust through Dialogue

Asian Survey ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 709-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baogang He
Keyword(s):  
Mutual Understanding ◽  
Mutual Trust ◽  
Moderating Effects ◽  
Deliberative Dialogue

This paper reviews and compares three deliberative approaches to conflict, and applies the deliberative approach to the Tibet issue. It examines the case of a deliberative workshop, its achievements and limits. Deliberative dialogue appears to have improved knowledge and mutual understanding, enhanced mutual trust and deliberative capacities, and produced moderating effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document