Parental participation in the care of hospitalized children: a review of the research evidence

2000 ◽  
pp. 57-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Savage ◽  
Peter Callery
Keyword(s):  
Research Evidence ◽  
Parental Participation ◽  
Hospitalized Children

Parental Participation in the Care of Hospitalized Children

1994 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inger Kristensson-Hallström ◽  
Gunnel Elander
Keyword(s):  
Parental Participation ◽  
Hospitalized Children

How should we understand family-centred care?

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 460-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suzanne Uniacke ◽  
Tamara Kayali Browne ◽  
Linda Shields
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Parental Participation ◽  
Hospitalized Children ◽  
Her Family ◽  
Critical Understanding

What is family-centred care of a hospitalized child? A critical understanding of the concept of family-centred care is necessary if this widely preferred model is to be differentiated from other health care ideals and properly evaluated as appropriate to the care of hospitalized children. The article identifies distinguishable interpretations of family-centred care that can pull health professionals in different, sometimes conflicting directions. Some of these interpretations are not qualitatively different from robust interpretations of the ideals of parental participation, care-by-parent and partnership in care that are said to be the precursors of family-centred care. A prominent interpretation that regards the child and his or her family collectively as the ‘unit of care’ arguably arises from ambiguity and is significantly problematic as a model for the care of hospitalized children. Clinical practice driven by this interpretation can include courses of action that do not aim to do what will best promote a hospitalized child’s welfare, and such cases will not be unusual. More broadly, this interpretation raises challenging questions about the responsibilities and authority of health professionals in relation to the interests of hospitalized children and their families.

What Does Evidence-Based Practice Mean to You? A Follow-Up Study Examining School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists' Perspectives on Evidence-Based Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 688-704
Author(s):  
Katrina Fulcher-Rood ◽  
Anny Castilla-Earls ◽  
Jeff Higginbotham
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Clinical Expertise ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
School Based ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Ebp Implementation

Purpose The current investigation is a follow-up from a previous study examining child language diagnostic decision making in school-based speech-language pathologists (SLPs). The purpose of this study was to examine the SLPs' perspectives regarding the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) in their clinical work. Method Semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 25 school-based SLPs who previously participated in an earlier study by Fulcher-Rood et al. 2018). SLPs were asked questions regarding their definition of EBP, the value of research evidence, contexts in which they implement scientific literature in clinical practice, and the barriers to implementing EBP. Results SLPs' definitions of EBP differed from current definitions, in that SLPs only included the use of research findings. SLPs seem to discuss EBP as it relates to treatment and not assessment. Reported barriers to EBP implementation were insufficient time, limited funding, and restrictions from their employment setting. SLPs found it difficult to translate research findings to clinical practice. SLPs implemented external research evidence when they did not have enough clinical expertise regarding a specific client or when they needed scientific evidence to support a strategy they used. Conclusions SLPs appear to use EBP for specific reasons and not for every clinical decision they make. In addition, SLPs rely on EBP for treatment decisions and not for assessment decisions. Educational systems potentially present other challenges that need to be considered for EBP implementation. Considerations for implementation science and the research-to-practice gap are discussed.

Off-Label Drug Use Rife in Hospitalized Children

2007 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 59 ◽  
Author(s):  
MARY ANN MOON
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  
Hospitalized Children ◽  
Off Label

Hospitalized Children With IBD Face Thrombosis Risk

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
MIRIAM E. TUCKER
Keyword(s):  
Hospitalized Children ◽  
Thrombosis Risk

Daily Fluctuations in Work Engagement

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold B. Bakker
Keyword(s):  
Job Performance ◽  
Work Engagement ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Organizational Outcomes ◽  
Reciprocal Relationship ◽  
Proactive Behavior ◽  
Negative Events ◽  
Daily Work ◽  
Work Pressure ◽  
Diary Research

This article presents an overview of the literature on daily fluctuations in work engagement. Daily work engagement is a state of vigor, dedication, and absorption that is predictive of important organizational outcomes, including job performance. After briefly discussing enduring work engagement, the advantages of diary research are discussed, as well as the concept and measurement of daily work engagement. The research evidence shows that fluctuations in work engagement are a function of the changes in daily job and personal resources. Particularly on the days that employees have access to many resources, they are able to cope well with their daily job demands (e.g., work pressure, negative events), and likely interpret these demands as challenges. Furthermore, the literature review shows that on the days employees have sufficient levels of job control, they proactively try to optimize their work environment in order to stay engaged. This proactive behavior is called job crafting and predicts momentary and daily work engagement. An important additional finding is that daily engagement has a reciprocal relationship with daily recovery. On the days employees recover well, they feel more engaged; and engagement during the day is predictive of subsequent recovery. Finding the daily balance between engagement while at work and detachment while at home seems the key to enduring work engagement.

Review of Emotional Care of Hospitalized Children: An Environmental Approach.

1973 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 244-245
Author(s):  
ANTHONY DAVIDS
Keyword(s):  
Hospitalized Children
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document