Activity—Gating Attentional Networks

Author(s):  
J. Eggert ◽  
J. L. van Hemmen
Keyword(s):  
Perception ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (12) ◽  
pp. 1375-1386
Author(s):  
Bin Wang ◽  
Jingjing Zhao ◽  
Zheng Wu ◽  
Wei Shang ◽  
Jie Xiang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 503
Author(s):  
Jasmine Giovannoli ◽  
Diana Martella ◽  
Maria Casagrande

Attention involves three functionally and neuroanatomically distinct neural networks: alerting, orienting, and executive control. This study aimed to assess the attentional networks and vigilance in adolescents aged between 10 and 19 years using the attentional network test for interaction and vigilance (ANTI-V). One hundred and eighty-two adolescents divided into three groups (early adolescents, middle adolescents, late adolescents) participated in the study. The results indicate that after age 15, adolescents adopt a more conservative response strategy and increase the monitoring of self-errors. All the attentional networks seem to continue to develop during the age range considered in this study (10–19 y). Performance improved from early adolescence to middle adolescence and began to stabilize in late adolescence. Moreover, a low level of vigilance seems to harm alerting and orienting abilities.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 647-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Fan ◽  
Silvia Bernardi ◽  
Nicholas T. Dam ◽  
Evdokia Anagnostou ◽  
Xiaosi Gu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melina Kunar ◽  
Derrick Watson ◽  
Rhiannon Richards ◽  
Daniel Gunnell

Previous work has shown that talking on a mobile phone leads to an impairment of visual attention. Gunnell et al. (2020) investigated the locus of these dual-task impairments and found that although phone conversations led to cognitive delays in response times, other mechanisms underlying particular selective attention tasks were unaffected. Here we investigated which attentional networks, if any, were impaired by having a phone conversation. We used the Attentional Network Task (ANT) to evaluate performance of the alerting, orienting and executive attentional networks, both in conditions where people were engaged in a conversation and where they were silent. Two experiments showed that there was a robust delay in response across all three networks. However, at the individual network level, holding a conversation did not influence the size of the alerting or orienting effects but it did reduce the size of the conflict effect within the executive network. The findings suggest that holding a conversation can reduce the overall speed of responding and, via its influence on the executive network, can reduce the amount of information that can be processed from the environment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 242 ◽  
pp. 113602
Author(s):  
Caleb Stone ◽  
Luke Ney ◽  
Kim Felmingham ◽  
David Nichols ◽  
Allison Matthews

Cortex ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 132 ◽  
pp. 206-222
Author(s):  
Paola Mengotti ◽  
Anne-Sophie Käsbauer ◽  
Gereon R. Fink ◽  
Simone Vossel

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document