Microdiscectomy/Microdecompression for Intraspinal Intervertebral Disc Prolapses and Lateral Recess Stenosis

2011 ◽  
pp. 197-204
Author(s):  
Robert A. Dunsmuir
Keyword(s):  
Intervertebral Disc ◽  
Lateral Recess ◽  
Lateral Recess Stenosis

Prompt Return to Work after Bilateral Transforaminal Full-endoscopic Lateral Recess Decompression under Local Anesthesia: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kosuke Sugiura ◽  
Kazuta Yamashita ◽  
Hiroaki Manabe ◽  
Yoshihiro Ishihama ◽  
Fumitake Tezuka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Lateral Recess ◽  
Canal Stenosis ◽  
Transforaminal Approach ◽  
Lateral Recess Stenosis ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Herniated Nucleus Pulposus

AbstractTransforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar diskectomy became established early in the 21st century. It can be performed under local anesthesia and requires only an 8-mm skin incision, making it the least invasive disk surgery method available. The full-endoscopic technique has recently been used to treat lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Here, we describe the outcome of simultaneous bilateral decompression of lumbar lateral recess stenosis via a transforaminal approach under local anesthesia in a 60-year-old man. The patient presented with a complaint of bilateral leg pain that was preventing him from standing and walking, and he had been able to continue his work as a dentist by treating patients while seated. Imaging studies revealed bilateral lumbar lateral recess stenosis with central herniated nucleus pulposus at L4/5. We performed simultaneous bilateral transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD) under local anesthesia. Both decompression and diskectomy were successfully completed without complications. Five days after TE-LRD, he was able to return to work, and 3 months after the surgery, he resumed playing golf. Full-endoscopic surgery under local anesthesia can be very effective in patients who need to return to work as soon as possible after surgery.

Sacral plexus disorder caused by a wooden toothpick in the rectum

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e238690
Author(s):  
Takuro Endo ◽  
Taku Sugawara ◽  
Naoki Higashiyama
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Spinal Nerve ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Sacral Plexus ◽  
Lateral Recess ◽  
Lateral Recess Stenosis ◽  
Preoperative Ct ◽  
History Of ◽  
History Of Pain ◽  
The Right

A 67-year-old man presented with a 2-month history of pain in his right buttock and lower limb. MRI depicted right L5/S1 lateral recess stenosis requiring surgical treatment; however, preoperative CT showed an approximately 7 cm long, thin, rod-shaped structure in the rectum, which was ultimately determined to be an accidentally ingested toothpick. It was removed surgically 6 days after diagnosis, because right leg pain worsened rapidly. The pain disappeared thereafter, and the symptoms have not recurred since. The pain might have been localised to the right buttock and posterior thigh in the early stages because the fine tip of the toothpick was positioned to the right of the anterior ramus of the S2 spinal nerve. Although sacral plexus disorder caused by a rectal foreign body is extremely rare, physicians should be mindful to avoid misdiagnosis.

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes of TESSYS and TESSYS-ISEE Approach on Treatment of Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Comparison Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boyu Wu ◽  
Chengjie Xiong ◽  
Biwang Huang ◽  
Dongdong Zhao ◽  
Zhipeng Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Lateral Recess ◽  
Lumbar Decompression ◽  
Lateral Recess Stenosis ◽  
Short Period

Abstract Background: Lateral recess stenosis (LRS) is a common degenerative disease in the elderly. Since the rise of comorbidity is associated with the increasing age, the percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression is advocated. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression in LRS via TESSYS or TESSYS-ISEE approach. Methods: A total of 45 and 42 consecutive patients with limp or radiculopathy symptoms underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression using transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) and TESSYS-ISEE, respectively. The radiation exposure and operation time, time to return to work, and complications were compared between two groups. Their clinical outcomes were evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS) leg pain score, VAS back pain score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Modified MacNab’s criteria. Results: The average values of radiation exposure and operative time in TESSYS group were significantly higher than those in TESSYS-ISEE group (P<0.05). The postoperative VAS and ODI scores in both groups were significantly improved compared with before the operation (P<0.05). In addition, the VAS score of the leg and ODI score in the TESSYS-ISEE group were significantly lower than those in TESSYS group at 1 week follow-up (P<0.05). The good-to-excellent rates of the TESSYS and TESSYS-ISEE group were 88.89 and 90.48%, respectively, whereas the complication occurrence rates were 6.67 and 4.76% in TESSYS and TESSYS-ISEE groups, respectively. Conclusions: TESSYS-ISEE can be applied to treat LRS safely and effectively with short radiation exposure and operation time. This approach was comparable to the TESSYS approach with improved VAS leg pain and ODI score in short period after operation. However, potential complications and risks still needs to be considered.

Lateral Recess Stenosis as a Cause for Failed Back Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Hazim Mahmooud ◽  
Rasha Abdul Hafith Al-youzbaky
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Recess ◽  
Lateral Recess Stenosis ◽  
Failed Back Surgery ◽  
Back Surgery

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis between Three Different Lumbar Decompression Techniques (Microscopic, Tubular, and Endoscopic) in Lumbar Canal and Lateral Recess Stenosis: Preliminary Report

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chul-Woo Lee ◽  
Kang-Jun Yoon ◽  
Sang-Soo Ha
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Surgical Outcome ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Clinical Success Rate ◽  
Decompression Surgery ◽  
Lateral Recess ◽  
Lumbar Decompression ◽  
Lateral Recess Stenosis ◽  
Canal Diameter

Purpose. The purpose of our study is to compare the results of spinal decompression using the full-endoscopic interlaminar technique, tubular retractor, and a conventional microsurgical laminotomy technique and evaluate the advantages and clinical feasibility of minimally invasive spinal (MIS) lumbar decompression technique in the lumbar canal and lateral recess stenosis. Methods. The authors retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiological data from 270 patients who received microsurgical (group E: 72 patients), tubular (group T: 34 patients), or full-endoscopic decompression surgery (group E: 164 patients) for their lumbar canal and lateral recess stenosis from June 2016 to August 2017. Clinical (VAS, ODI, and Mcnab criteria), radiologic (spinal canal diameter, segmental dynamic angle, and disc height), and surgical outcome parameters (CPK level, Operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively and compared among the three groups by means of statistical analysis. Failed cases and complications were reviewed in all groups. Results. The mean follow-up period was 6.38 months. The Overall clinical success rate was 89.4%. All groups showed favorable clinical outcome. The clinical and radiologic results were similar in all groups. Regarding surgical outcome, group E showed longer operation time than group M and T (group E: 84.17 minutes/level, group M: 52.22 minutes/level, and group T: 66.12 minutes/level) (p<0.05). However, groups E and T showed minimal surgical invasiveness compared with group M. Groups E and T showed less immediate postoperative back pain (VAS) (group E: 3.13, group M: 4.28, group T: 3.54) (p<0.05), less increase of serum CPK enzyme (group E: 66.38 IU/L, group M: 120 IU/L, and group T: 137.5 IU/L) (p<0.05), and shorter hospital stay (group E: 2.12 days, group M: 4.85 days, and group T: 2.83 days) (p<0.05). The rates of complications and revisions were not significantly different among the three groups. Conclusions. MIS decompression technique is clinically feasible and safe to treat the lumbar canal and lateral recess stenosis, and it has many surgical advantages such as less muscle trauma, minimal postoperative back pain, and fast recovery of the patient compared to traditional open microscopic technique.

scholarly journals Using a percutaneous spinal endoscopy unilateral posterior interlaminar approach to perform bilateral decompression for patients with lumbar lateral recess stenosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 593-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhijun Xin ◽  
Peng Huang ◽  
Guoquan Zheng ◽  
Wenbo Liao ◽  
Xifeng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lateral Recess ◽  
Lateral Recess Stenosis ◽  
Interlaminar Approach

scholarly journals Outcome of lumbar lateral recess stenosis with percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression in patients 65 years of age or older and in younger patients

Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (29) ◽  
pp. e21049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiang Li ◽  
Tao Liu ◽  
Junjun Fan ◽  
Hongtao Zhang ◽  
Chunbao Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Younger Patients ◽  
Lateral Recess ◽  
Lateral Recess Stenosis
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document