Method for Bisulfite Sequencing Data Analysis for Whole-Genome Level DNA Methylation Detection in Legumes

Author(s):  
Khushboo Gupta ◽  
Rohini Garg
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maia Malonzo ◽  
Viivi Halla-aho ◽  
Mikko Konki ◽  
Riikka J. Lund ◽  
Harri Lähdesmäki

AbstractDNA methylation is measured using bisulfite sequencing (BS-seq). Bisulfite conversion can have low efficiency and a DNA sample is then processed multiple times generating DNA libraries with different bisulfite conversion rates. Libraries with low conversion rates are excluded from analysis resulting in reduced coverage and increased costs. We present a method and software, LuxRep, that accounts for technical replicates from different bisulfite-converted DNA libraries. We show that including replicates with low bisulfite conversion rates generates more accurate estimates of methylation levels and differentially methylated sites.AvailabilityAn implementation of the method is available at https://github.com/tare/LuxGLM/tree/master/[email protected]


PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e86707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Liang ◽  
Bixia Tang ◽  
Yanqing Wang ◽  
Jianfeng Wang ◽  
Caixia Yu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (19) ◽  
pp. e117-e117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Wulfridge ◽  
Ben Langmead ◽  
Andrew P Feinberg ◽  
Kasper D Hansen

Abstract In the study of DNA methylation, genetic variation between species, strains or individuals can result in CpG sites that are exclusive to a subset of samples, and insertions and deletions can rearrange the spatial distribution of CpGs. How to account for this variation in an analysis of the interplay between sequence variation and DNA methylation is not well understood, especially when the number of CpG differences between samples is large. Here, we use whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data on two highly divergent mouse strains to study this problem. We show that alignment to personal genomes is necessary for valid methylation quantification. We introduce a method for including strain-specific CpGs in differential analysis, and show that this increases power. We apply our method to a human normal-cancer dataset, and show this improves accuracy and power, illustrating the broad applicability of our approach. Our method uses smoothing to impute methylation levels at strain-specific sites, thereby allowing strain-specific CpGs to contribute to the analysis, while accounting for differences in the spatial occurrences of CpGs. Our results have implications for joint analysis of genetic variation and DNA methylation using bisulfite-converted DNA, and unlocks the use of personal genomes for addressing this question.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip Wulfridge ◽  
Ben Langmead ◽  
Andrew P. Feinberg ◽  
Kasper D. Hansen

AbstractIn the study of DNA methylation, genetic variation between species, strains, or individuals can result in CpG sites that are exclusive to a subset of samples, and insertions and deletions can rearrange the spatial distribution of CpGs. How to account for this variation in an analysis of the interplay between sequence variation and DNA methylation is not well understood, especially when the number of CpG differences between samples is large. Here we use whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data on two highly divergent inbred mouse strains to study this problem. We find that while the large number of strain-specific CpGs necessitates considerations regarding the reference genomes used during alignment, properties such as CpG density are surprisingly conserved across the genome. We introduce a method for including strain-specific CpGs in differential analysis, and show that accounting for strain-specific CpGs increases the power to find differentially methylated regions between the strains. Our method uses smoothing to impute methylation levels at strain-specific sites, thereby allowing strain-specific CpGs to contribute to the analysis, and also allowing us to account for differences in the spatial occurrences of CpGs. Our results have implications for analysis of genetic variation and DNA methylation using bisulfite-converted DNA.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document