Putting Cognitive Theory to the Test: Group Testing Reassessed Using the Cross-cultural Method

Author(s):  
Sid H. Irvine ◽  
Aubrey Schoeman ◽  
Willie Prinsloo
1957 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-448
Author(s):  
George W. Goethals ◽  
John W. M. Whiting

1957 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 441
Author(s):  
George W. Goethals ◽  
John W. M. Whiting

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Chia-ju, Lin

<p><em>Based on cross-cultural theory, </em><em>this study applies in-depth interviewing and focus group testing to examine the difficulties and challenges faced by Taiwanese undergraduates while communicating with international students in an English immersion instruction environment at the International College and analyze how the former should adapt themselves to the cross-cultural learning environment. This study indicates that language competence is the main factor affecting local students’ adaptation to the cross-cultural environment at the International College.</em><em> Low language proficiency, pertaining to either schoolwork or interpersonal communication, is the main cause of anxiety and nervousness among local students during the earlier stage of adaptation. According to the adaptation curve, the honeymoon stage experienced by local students following enrollment is extremely short and is usually accompanied by anxiety and uneasiness. Their adaptation stage comprises two aspects, schoolwork and life.</em><em> Regarding the schoolwork aspect, local students face a relatively long crisis stage because only after making certain improvement in English proficiency can they gradually adapt themselves to the cross-cultural learning environment. However, in terms of the life aspect, it takes a comparatively shorter time for local students to adapt themselves to cross-cultural conflicts, and they can rapidly enter the </em><em>recovery and biculturalism adaptation stages.</em><em></em></p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 181-196
Author(s):  
A. K.  Alikberov

The article is devoted to the system classifi cation of religions on the basis of various criteria, the most important of which is the communication one. As the cross-cultural method shows, there is no word «religion» in many languages o  f the world, but there is its equivalent, denoting the connection of man with God and supernatural forces. The system classifi cation of religions is more a system of classifi cations than a classifi cation, which based on ideal, hypothetical models. It based on the object of worship (the religion of Nature, the religion of Tradition, the religion of Revelation), on the sources of the doctrine (the religion of the scriptures), on the methods of obtaining information, or, in the religious paradigm, religious knowledge /hidden truths (prophetic, non-prophetic, etc.). The author tries to fi nd conjugations between these classifi cations. The system-communication method is one of many possible ways of scientifi c knowledge of religion, which allows us to divide complex social essences and phenomena into composite elements, and each of them in their close interconnection and interaction with other elements of systematic knowledge, taking into account the specifi city of religious communication.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document