The Effects Of Forest Biomass Harvesting On Biodiversity

Author(s):  
Mats Jonsell
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 670-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Gaudreault ◽  
T. Bently Wigley ◽  
Manuele Margni ◽  
Jake Verschuyl ◽  
Kirsten Vice ◽  
...  

Energy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 758
Author(s):  
Fengli Zhang ◽  
Dana M. Johnson ◽  
Jinjiang Wang ◽  
Chunxia Yu

Author(s):  
Karsten Raulund-Rasmussen ◽  
Inge Stupak ◽  
Nicholas Clarke ◽  
Ingeborg Callesen ◽  
Heljä-Sisko Helmisaari ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Madrigal ◽  
Irma Fernández-Migueláñez ◽  
Carmen Hernando ◽  
Mercedes Guijarro ◽  
Daniel J. Vega-Nieva ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol XXXI (61 (3/II/14)) ◽  
pp. 453-458
Author(s):  
Henryk Różański ◽  
◽  
Krzysztof Jabłoński

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 45-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey G. Benjamin ◽  
Robert J. Lilieholm ◽  
Charles E. Coup

Abstract There is growing interest in harvesting forest biomass to meet the needs of bioenergy and bioproducts facilities in the Northeast. This interest is accompanied by increased concern over the potential impacts of biomass removals on forest ecosystems. Debates over biomass proposals have revealed a considerable level of confusion over the term biomass harvest, much of which stems from ambiguity surrounding the term forest biomass. Indeed, all forest material removed during harvest is forest biomass, yet many view only a small portion of this—typically low-value chipped material—as biomass. Since much of this material is destined for use as energy, we feel that communication among the public, foresters, academics, and industry representatives would improve by referring to forest biomass of this nature as what it really is: energy wood. Once terms are clarified, it is easier to understand how concerns with market dynamics, soil productivity, water quality, and forest biodiversity can be addressed through forest policy development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document