Self-Control Theory: Research Issues

Author(s):  
Alex R. Piquero
2020 ◽  
pp. 001112872098189
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Holt ◽  
Kevin F. Steinmetz

Criminological inquiry consistently identifies a gender difference in offending rates, which are also evident among certain forms of cybercrime. The gender difference in cybercrime offending is particularly large within computer hacking, though few have specifically addressed this issue through applications of criminological theory. The current study attempted to account for the gender disparity in hacking through a test of power-control theory, which considers the role of class and family structure. This analysis also incorporated an extension of power-control theory through the influence of low self-control. Using data from the Second International Self-Report of Delinquency study (ISRD-2), logistic regression analyses were estimated, producing partial support for both theories to account for hacking. Implications for theory and research were explored in detail.


2014 ◽  
Vol 644-650 ◽  
pp. 6297-6300
Author(s):  
Xiao Yan Yang

Process held in sports events and sports facilities is a key concept. Sports is the sports products production base, with the sports event organizing work unceasingly thorough, the focus gradually around the stadium and development, the resources utilization and allocation according to the layout and characteristics of venues need to. Large sports practice management experts gradually realized "venue" not only for the sport games is very important, for the whole event also played a decisive influence directly. Therefore, the stadium to run the risk of control theory research is very necessary.


2011 ◽  
pp. 2541-2542
Author(s):  
Roger J. R. Levesque
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Tony R. Smith ◽  
Jason D. Scott ◽  
Judy L. Porter ◽  
LaVerne McQuiller Williams

This study evaluates the generality of self-control theory with a previously untested cultural group rarely studied by criminologists, the Deaf community. Survey data ( n = 428) from participants attending a university that houses a college for the Deaf and hard-of-hearing were compared with a sample of “hearing” students. The findings support Gottfredson and Hirschi’s cultural invariance thesis as self-control was consistently able to predict a wide range of rule-breaking behaviors among the culturally distinct groups examined. However, several unexpected results challenge the parental management thesis. In particular, exposure to effective parenting techniques was a significant contributor to variations in self-control for the hearing, but not the Deaf sample. Additionally, self-control did not fully mediate the relationship between child-rearing experiences and norm violating behaviors for the Deaf sample. Implications of these findings are discussed.


2018 ◽  
pp. 49-94
Author(s):  
David F. Greenberg ◽  
Robin Tamarelli ◽  
Margaret S. Kelley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document