Interactive Practice Exercises for Psychiatric Classification

Author(s):  
Luciano L’Abate
1994 ◽  
Vol 165 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Shepherd

During several recent international meetings on classification, there have been frequent references to national systems of classification developed and used in Europe, North America and many other countries. The UK has been notably absent from this list. As Professor Kendell, in his brief historical survey of the subject, points out: “British psychiatry does not have, and indeed never has had, any important diagnostic concepts of its own in the way that French, American, and Scandinavian psychiatry still do” (Kendell, 1985).


Cephalalgia ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12_suppl) ◽  
pp. 34-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Ries Merikangas ◽  
Allen Frances

This paper reviews the development of diagnostic criteria for the psychiatric disorders in order to provide a model for the development of classification of headache. The strengths and weaknesses of the current psychiatric classification system, and procedures that have been instituted to strengthen the next version of the classification are described. The problems that characterized the successive versions of the criteria are highlighted in order to stimulate future developments of diagnostic criteria for headache syndromes. Recommendations for application of these principles to headache classification are presented.


1970 ◽  
Vol 117 (538) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Kendell ◽  
Jane Gourlay

The distinction between schizophrenic and affective illnesses has been one of the cornerstones of psychiatric classification ever since Kraepelin introduced the twin concepts of dementia praecox and manic depressive psychosis at the turn of the century. It has also long been recognized that some patients have both schizophrenic and affective symptoms, and various interpretations have been placed on these mixed states. To some continental psychiatrists they constitute a third group of psychoses distinct from both schizophrenia and manic-depressive psychosis—the degeneration psychoses of Kleist or the cycloid psychoses of Leonhard. By others they are regarded as genuine mixed states, with the implication that elements of both schizophrenia and manic depressive illnesses are contributing, perhaps because the genetic or constitutional endowment is mixed, perhaps because two alternative defence mechanisms are being utilized simultaneously. Often, however, mixed symptomatology is simply ignored, either by discounting the schizophrenic symptoms and focusing attention on the mood change, or, as most American psychiatrists do, by glossing over the affective symptoms and regarding the illness as a form of schizophrenia differing in no significant respect from other schizophrenias.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document