scholarly journals On the field of rationality for an abelian variety

2002 ◽  
pp. 459-470
Author(s):  
Goro Shimura
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (A) ◽  
pp. 36-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinxiang Zeng

AbstractLet $\def \xmlpi #1{}\def \mathsfbi #1{\boldsymbol {\mathsf {#1}}}\let \le =\leqslant \let \leq =\leqslant \let \ge =\geqslant \let \geq =\geqslant \def \Pr {\mathit {Pr}}\def \Fr {\mathit {Fr}}\def \Rey {\mathit {Re}}f\in S_2(\Gamma _0(N))$ be a normalized newform such that the abelian variety $A_f$ attached by Shimura to $f$ is the Jacobian of a genus-two curve. We give an efficient algorithm for computing Galois representations associated to such newforms.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (749) ◽  
pp. 65-86
Author(s):  
Pete L. Clark ◽  
Allan Lacy

Abstract We show that a nontrivial abelian variety over a Hilbertian field in which the weak Mordell–Weil theorem holds admits infinitely many torsors with period any given n>1 that is not divisible by the characteristic. The corresponding statement with “period” replaced by “index” is plausible but open, and it seems much more challenging. We show that for every infinite, finitely generated field K, there is an elliptic curve E_{/K} which admits infinitely many torsors with index any given n>1 .


2010 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 579-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
ARNO FEHM ◽  
SEBASTIAN PETERSEN

A field K is called ample if every smooth K-curve that has a K-rational point has infinitely many of them. We prove two theorems to support the following conjecture, which is inspired by classical infinite rank results: Every non-zero Abelian variety A over an ample field K which is not algebraic over a finite field has infinite rank. First, the ℤ(p)-module A(K) ⊗ ℤ(p) is not finitely generated, where p is the characteristic of K. In particular, the conjecture holds for fields of characteristic zero. Second, if K is an infinite finitely generated field and S is a finite set of local primes of K, then every Abelian variety over K acquires infinite rank over certain subfields of the maximal totally S-adic Galois extension of K. This strengthens a recent infinite rank result of Geyer and Jarden.


2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
MAJID HADIAN ◽  
MATTHEW WEIDNER

In this paper we study the variation of the $p$-Selmer rank parities of $p$-twists of a principally polarized Abelian variety over an arbitrary number field $K$ and show, under certain assumptions, that this parity is periodic with an explicit period. Our result applies in particular to principally polarized Abelian varieties with full $K$-rational $p$-torsion subgroup, arbitrary elliptic curves, and Jacobians of hyperelliptic curves. Assuming the Shafarevich–Tate conjecture, our result allows one to classify the rank parities of all quadratic twists of an elliptic or hyperelliptic curve after a finite calculation.


Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Achter ◽  
Sebastian Casalaina-Martin ◽  
Charles Vial

AbstractFor a complex projective manifold, Walker has defined a regular homomorphism lifting Griffiths’ Abel–Jacobi map on algebraically trivial cycle classes to a complex abelian variety, which admits a finite homomorphism to the Griffiths intermediate Jacobian. Recently Suzuki gave an alternate, Hodge-theoretic, construction of this Walker Abel–Jacobi map. We provide a third construction based on a general lifting property for surjective regular homomorphisms, and prove that the Walker Abel–Jacobi map descends canonically to any field of definition of the complex projective manifold. In addition, we determine the image of the l-adic Bloch map restricted to algebraically trivial cycle classes in terms of the coniveau filtration.


2013 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-228
Author(s):  
Amod Agashe
Keyword(s):  

AbstractLet J be an abelian variety and A be an abelian subvariety of J , both defined over Q. Let x be an element of H 1(Q; A ). Then there are at least two definitions of x being visible in J : one asks that the torsor corresponding to x be isomorphic over Q to a subvariety of J , and the other asks that x be in the kernel of the natural map H1 (Q;A ) → H 1(Q; J ). In this article, we clarify the relation between the two definitions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document