The Ileal Brake

Dietary Fiber ◽  
1990 ◽  
pp. 219-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. W. Read ◽  
C. P. Sepple ◽  
N. J. Brown
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 44 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Nicolaus ◽  
S Shakir ◽  
HJ Wörle ◽  
B Göke ◽  
J Schirra
Keyword(s):  

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1601
Author(s):  
Jennifer Wilbrink ◽  
Gwen Masclee ◽  
Tim Klaassen ◽  
Mark van Avesaat ◽  
Daniel Keszthelyi ◽  
...  

Macronutrients in the gastrointestinal (GI) lumen are able to activate “intestinal brakes”, feedback mechanisms on proximal GI motility and secretion including appetite and energy intake. In this review, we provide a detailed overview of the current evidence with respect to four questions: (1) are regional differences (duodenum, jejunum, ileum) present in the intestinal luminal nutrient modulation of appetite and energy intake? (2) is this “intestinal brake” effect macronutrient specific? (3) is this “intestinal brake” effect maintained during repetitive activation? (4) can the “intestinal brake” effect be activated via non-caloric tastants? Recent evidence indicates that: (1) regional differences exist in the intestinal modulation of appetite and energy intake with a proximal to distal gradient for inhibition of energy intake: ileum and jejunum > duodenum at low but not at high caloric infusion rates. (2) the “intestinal brake” effect on appetite and energy appears not to be macronutrient specific. At equi-caloric amounts, the inhibition on energy intake and appetite is in the same range for fat, protein and carbohydrate. (3) data on repetitive ileal brake activation are scarce because of the need for prolonged intestinal intubation. During repetitive activation of the ileal brake for up to 4 days, no adaptation was observed but overall the inhibitory effect on energy intake was small. (4) the concept of influencing energy intake by intra-intestinal delivery of non-caloric tastants is intriguing. Among tastants, the bitter compounds appear to be more effective in influencing energy intake. Energy intake decreases modestly after post-oral delivery of bitter tastants or a combination of tastants (bitter, sweet and umami). Intestinal brake activation provides an interesting concept for preventive and therapeutic approaches in weight management strategies.


2012 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
H. Shin ◽  
J. Ingram ◽  
K. Lo ◽  
A. McGill ◽  
S. Poppitt
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Henry C. Lin ◽  
Nancy Ling
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 423-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. T. Martín ◽  
F. Azpiroz ◽  
J.‐R. Malagelada
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
M. Miglioli ◽  
L. Pironi ◽  
V. Stanghellini ◽  
C. Tosetti ◽  
E. Ruggeri ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 559-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Teresa Martín ◽  
Fernando Azpiroz ◽  
Juan-R. Malagelada
Keyword(s):  

Gut ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1042-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
R C Spiller ◽  
I F Trotman ◽  
T E Adrian ◽  
S R Bloom ◽  
J J Misiewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Darzi ◽  
Gary S. Frost ◽  
M. Denise Robertson

The recently discovered SCFA-activated G-coupled protein receptors FFA receptor 2 and FFA receptor 3 are co-localised in l-cells with the anorexigenic ‘ileal brake’ gut hormone peptide YY, and also in adipocytes, with activation stimulating leptin release. Thus, SCFA such as acetate and propionate show promise as a candidate to increase satiety-enhancing properties of food. We therefore postulate SCFA may have a role in appetite regulation and energy homeostasis. SCFA can be delivered either directly within food, or indirectly via the colon by the provision of fermentable non-digestible carbohydrates. A review of studies investigating the effects of oral SCFA ingestion on appetite suggests that while oral SCFA ingestion is associated with enhanced satiety, this may be explained by product palatability rather than a physiological effect of SCFA. Colon-derived SCFA generated during microfloral fermentation have also been suggested to explain satiety-enhancing properties of non-digestible carbohydrates. However, findings are mixed from investigations into the effects of the prebiotic inulin-type fructans on appetite. Overall, data presented in this review do not support a role for SCFA in appetite regulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document