Early Warning Signs of Cancer in Children/Models for Early Diagnosis

Author(s):  
Stelios Poyiadjis ◽  
Lisine Tuyisenge
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Kristian Lunden ◽  
Ellen Jorum

Abstract Objectives Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a disabling usually post-traumatic pain condition. International guidelines emphasize early diagnosis for treatment and improved outcome. Early intense and persistent pain along with features of autonomic dysfunction in the first week’s post-injury are early warning signs for development of CRPS. We have previously reported a delayed diagnosis of CRPS. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate possible causes of a delayed diagnosis, with a special focus of recognition of risk factors. Methods A total of 52 CRPS 1 (without detectable nerve damage) and CRPS 2 (with evidence of nerve lesion) patients were included in the study. When examined at OUS-Rikshospitalet, we retrospectively asked the patients on the development of pain and autonomic abnormalities from the time of the eliciting injury, performed a thorough clinical investigation with an emphasis on signs of autonomic failure and compared symptoms and clinical findings with such information in previous medical records. We also evaluated symptoms and signs according to the type of injury they had suffered. Results Of a total of 52 patients (30 women and 22 men, mean age 39.0 years at the time of injury), 34 patients had CRPS type 1 (65.4%) and 18 CRPS type 2 (34.6%), 25 patients with pain in the upper and 27 in the lower extremity. A total of 35 patients (67.3%) were diagnosed with CRPS (following mean 2.1 years) prior to the investigation at OUS-Rikshospitalet (mean 4.86 years following injury). Mean time from injury to diagnosis was 33.5 months (SD 30.6) (2.8 years) for all patients. In retrospect, all 17 patients first diagnosed at OUS met the CRPS diagnosis at an earlier stage. All patients retrospectively reported intense pain (numeric rating scale > 7) from the time of injury with a large discrepancy to previous medical records which only stated intense pain in 29.4% of patients with CRPS type 1 and 44.4% of patients with CRPS type 2 within the first four months. While the patients reported an early onset of autonomic dysfunction, present in 67.3 and 94.2% of the patients within one week and one month, respectively, reports of autonomic abnormalities within the first four months was far less (maximum in 51.7% of patients with CRPS type 1 and in 60% in CRPS 2). In 10 patients with CRPS type 1, no symptom nor sign of autonomic abnormalities was reported. Conclusions We still find a significant delay in the diagnosis of CRPS. There is a large discrepancy between both self-reporting of intense, disproportionate pain, as well as symptoms of autonomic abnormalities from the time of injury, and documentation in previous medical records. Our findings suggest a lack of awareness of risk factors for the development of CRPS, such as early intense pain and autonomic abnormalities without recovery, contributing to delayed diagnosis. The present results suggest causes of delayed CRPS-diagnosis. An increased attention to early warning signs/risk factors may improve diagnosis of CRPS.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 828-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gulnara Sharaborova ◽  
Derek H.T. Walker ◽  
Guinevere Gilbert

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary report and reflect on a recently passed PhD thesis (Sharaborova, 2014b) related to project management topics. Design/methodology/approach – This paper focussed on narrative reflection upon the completed doctoral journey. Findings – This paper presents the thesis findings, the research models, the guide in dealing with the early warning signs that developed as a result of this research and the contribution made to theory and practice. Research limitations/implications – Limitations of the research and the perspectives of the further diffusion of the research findings are considered. Originality/value – This TRN is a PhD candidate’s point of view as well as the opinions of the scientific research supervisors about the doctoral study and its outcome. The paper could be useful for novice researchers who wish to conduct their research and did not yet make a decision.


Orthopedics ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1147-1147
Author(s):  
Charles Sorbie

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2529-2532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulaziz Ahmed Al-Darwish ◽  
Abdullah Fouad Al-Naim ◽  
Khalid Saleh Al-Mulhim ◽  
Nasser Khaled Al-Otaibi ◽  
Mohammed Saad Morsi ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 1016-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Dickinson ◽  
Lou Irving ◽  
Michael Hofman

BMJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. j5503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Linos ◽  
Natnaelle Admassu ◽  
Hala Sabry-Elnaggar ◽  
Peter MMC Li ◽  
Esther Choo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document