Cultural Evolution and Human Reproductive Behavior

2012 ◽  
pp. 481-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley Newson
2020 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 104530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter B. Gray ◽  
Alex A. Straftis ◽  
Brian M. Bird ◽  
Timothy S. McHale ◽  
Samuele Zilioli

2005 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lesley Newson ◽  
Tom Postmes ◽  
S. E. G Lea ◽  
Paul Webley

As societies modernize, they go through what has become known as “the demographic transition;” couples begin to limit the size of their families. Models to explain this change assume that reproductive behavior is either under individual control or under social control. The evidence that social influence plays a role in the control of reproduction is strong, but the models cannot adequately explain why the development of small family norms always accompanies modernization. We suggest that the widening of social networks, which has been found to occur with modernization, is sufficient to explain the change in reproductive norms if it is assumed that (a) advice and comment on reproduction that passes among kin is more likely to encourage the creation of families than that which passes among nonkin and (b) this advice and comment influence the social norms induced from the communications. This would, through a process of cultural evolution, lead to the development of norms that make it increasingly difficult to have large families.


1993 ◽  
Vol 40 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 61-73
Author(s):  
Klaus Jaffe ◽  
Debora Urribarri ◽  
Grace C. Chacon ◽  
Gerardo Diaz ◽  
Alfredo Torres ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 1462-1472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Barban ◽  
◽  
Rick Jansen ◽  
Ronald de Vlaming ◽  
Ahmad Vaez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. eabe1358
Author(s):  
C. Helfrich-Förster ◽  
S. Monecke ◽  
I. Spiousas ◽  
T. Hovestadt ◽  
O. Mitesser ◽  
...  

Many species synchronize reproductive behavior with a particular phase of the lunar cycle to increase reproductive success. In humans, a lunar influence on reproductive behavior remains controversial, although the human menstrual cycle has a period close to that of the lunar cycle. Here, we analyzed long-term menstrual recordings of individual women with distinct methods for biological rhythm analysis. We show that women’s menstrual cycles with a period longer than 27 days were intermittently synchronous with the Moon’s luminance and/or gravimetric cycles. With age and upon exposure to artificial nocturnal light, menstrual cycles shortened and lost this synchrony. We hypothesize that in ancient times, human reproductive behavior was synchronous with the Moon but that our modern lifestyles have changed reproductive physiology and behavior.


2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. L. Butovskaya ◽  
E. V. Veselovskaya ◽  
V. V. Rostovtseva ◽  
N. B. Selverova ◽  
I. V. Ermakova

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Penke

AbstractDel Giudice's model belongs among those that highlight the role of adaptive developmental plasticity in human reproductive strategies; but at least three other forms of evolutionary adaptation also influence reproductive behavior. Similar to earlier models, the existing evidence suggests that Del Giudice's hypothesized effects are rather weak. In particular, adult attachment styles are hardly predictive of outcomes visible to natural selection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document