Marking 35 Years of Research on Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence: Lessons and New Directions

Author(s):  
Adam M. Messinger
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin J. Lewis ◽  
Amana Carvalho ◽  
Valerian J. Derlega ◽  
Barbara A. Winstead ◽  
Claudia Viggiano

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Rollè ◽  
Giulia Giardina ◽  
Angela M. Caldarera ◽  
Eva Gerino ◽  
Piera Brustia

2020 ◽  
pp. 088626051989734
Author(s):  
Jessica Whitehead ◽  
Myrna Dawson ◽  
Tina Hotton

During the past 50 years, there has been an increase in research and programming initiatives focusing on the issue of heterosexual intimate partner violence (Het-IPV). In comparison, less attention has been paid to same-sex intimate partner violence (SS-IPV). Furthermore, of the existing research, the majority focuses on SS-IPV incidents in the United States which, due to social and legal differences, cannot yield an accurate picture of SS-IPV in Canada. This descriptive study sought to understand the prevalence, characteristics, and types of SS-IPV and Het-IPV within a Canadian context, with an emphasis on understanding the differences and similarities of incidents reported to police services. It explores the influences of heteronormativity and hegemonic masculinity on SS-IPV reporting and recognition. To assess this, data from Statistics Canada’s 2007–2011 Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Surveys were utilized. Participation in this survey is mandatory for all police services and, therefore, the sample used contains over 99% of incidents of IPV reported in Canada during the 4-year period ( N = 346,565). The results indicate that 4% of incidents of intimate partner violence reported to the UCR involved people engaged in same-sex relationships. It demonstrates that SS-IPV incidents are similar to Het-IPV incidents in reported prevalence, and the findings also show that there are differences in the types of violations reported and several incident characteristics, including levels of victim injury, and the population density of the offense location. These findings can provide a foundation for future research and raise further questions about how SS-IPV is responded to by the criminal justice system after it has been reported to police services.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-197
Author(s):  
Matthew Nicosia

Typically, the narrative surrounding intimate partner violence (IPV) involves men as perpetrators not victims. This is in part due to both low reporting from men and heteronormative expectations of masculinity. Furthermore, gay male victims are even less frequently discussed. In this autoethnographic article, I reflect on the power structure within violent same-sex relationships and the resulting loss of agency, self-worth, and personal identity victims experience. Because the conversation regarding IPV is often focused on the perpetrator rather than the victim, I intentionally leave the perpetrators anonymous and these experiences vague to instead focus attention on the trauma experienced by gay men. It is my hope this approach will render more intelligible the negotiations of agency, silence, and the performance of queer masculinity that victims experience. This article is neither about the act nor the perpetrator; rather it is about the response by and to the victim.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 374-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan G. Kimmes ◽  
Allen B. Mallory ◽  
Chelsea Spencer ◽  
Austin R. Beck ◽  
Bryan Cafferky ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 088626051875722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill T. Messing ◽  
Kristie A. Thomas ◽  
Allison L. Ward-Lasher ◽  
Nathan Q. Brewer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document