Risk Sensitivity, Adjustment of Control and Estimation

Author(s):  
Jati K. Sengupta ◽  
Phillip Fanchon
Keyword(s):  
2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-23
Author(s):  
Ernst Eberlein ◽  
Dilip Madan ◽  
Wim Schoutens

Author(s):  
Kyrill Schmid ◽  
Lenz Belzner ◽  
Marie Kiermeier ◽  
Alexander Neitz ◽  
Thomy Phan ◽  
...  

SURG Journal ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-40
Author(s):  
Jeff Cain ◽  
Kellen Walsh

Secondary Equity Offerings as a Leading Indicator of Market Performance examines the perception of an imminent market downturn as a motive behind new dilutive stock issuances. Market conditions, represented by the value of the TSX composite index, are found to have a weak , yet significant relationship with the total gross proceeds of secondary offerings. The paper interprets this relationship as evidence that an influx of seasoned equity offerings is a leading indicator of a market downturn. The paper suggests that this is a result of opportunistic managers cashing in on favourable market conditions in order to insulate their capital holdings while the opportunity is still available. The paper observes a trend in which the leading secondary issuances tend to occur in two distinct peaks. The “dual peak” effect is believed to be a product of herding by managers due to relative risk sensitivity.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 14-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Argimon ◽  
Gerard Arqué Castells ◽  
Francesc Rodríguez Tous

The main objective of this research is to gather empirical evidence on the effects of more or less stringency and more or less risk sensitivity in regulatory capital requirements on the observed behaviour of European banks during the initial years of the financial crisis. To do so, we use the indices built in Argimón and Ruiz (2010), which capture such characteristics of capital regulation. We test their incidence using changes in yearly data for individual banks for 25 countries of the European Union covering the period 2007-2009. Our results show that more stringency and risk sensitivity in capital regulation resulted in higher capital increases, with limited effect on risk taking. However, for well capitalized banks, higher risk sensitivity resulted in higher capital and higher risk, thus requiring striking the right balance, so as to lead to increased stability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document