History and Overview of Robotic Surgery in Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery

2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharat B. Yarlagadda ◽  
Matthew S. Russell ◽  
Gregory A. Grillone
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery

scholarly journals Acceptance and adoption of transoral robotic surgery in Germany

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magis Mandapathil ◽  
Jens E. Meyer
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Adoption Rate ◽  
Decision Making Processes ◽  
Sectional Analysis

Abstract Purpose Since its introduction over a decade ago, the use of robotic surgery (RS) in head and neck surgery has widely spread around the globe, with very differential adoption of this novel surgical technique in different parts of the world. In this study, we analyze the acceptance and adoption of robotic surgery in the head and neck in Germany. Materials and methods A cross-sectional analysis using a questionnaire evaluating the acceptance and adoption of RS was performed. Questionnaires were distributed to all chairmen /-women of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Departments in Germany. Results A total of 107 respondents completed the questionnaire (65.2%). At university hospitals, 71.4% of the respondents indicated that a robotic system was available, and 21.4% responded that robotic surgery was performed at their institution; 22.7% and 0.04%, respectively, at non-university hospitals. The overall adoption rate was 0.8%. The most common cases performed were TORS resection in the oropharynx. Main reasons for not adopting this technique were costs, lack of interest and available co-operations. Conclusion This study provides evidence of the extent of adoption of TORS in Germany; main perceived barriers to adoption are costs with lack of cost-covering reimbursement and insufficient co-operations with other disciplines as well as hospital administration resulting in a very low adoption rate of this technique over the past decade. Results from this study may assist in decision-making processes on adopting this technique in the future.

A National Survey of Robotic Surgery Training Among Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Residents

2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942199696
Author(s):  
Hilary C. McCrary ◽  
Sierra R. McLean ◽  
Abigail Luman ◽  
Patricia O’Sullivan ◽  
Brigitte Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Surgery Training ◽  
Robotic Surgery Training ◽  
Operative Experience

Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the current state of robotic surgery training among Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) residency programs in the United States. Methods: This is a national survey study among OHNS residents. All OHNS residency programs were identified via the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education website. A total of 64/127 (50.3%) of OHNS programs were selected based on a random number generator. The main outcome measure was the number of OHNS residents with access to robotic surgery training and assessment of operative experience in robotic surgery among those residents. Results: A total of 140 OHNS residents participated in the survey, of which 59.3% (n = 83) were male. Response rate was 40.2%. Respondents came from middle 50.0% (n = 70), southern 17.8% (n = 25), western 17.8% (n = 25), and eastern sections 14.3% (n = 20). Most respondents (94.3%, n = 132) reported that their institution utilized a robot for head and neck surgery. Resident experience at the bedside increased in the junior years of training and console experience increased across the years particularly for more senior residents. However, 63.4% of residents reported no operative experience at the console. Only 11.4% of programs have a structured robotics training program. Conclusion: This survey indicated that nearly all OHNS residencies utilize robotic surgery in their clinical practice with residents receiving little formal education in robotics or experience at the console. OHNS residencies should aim to increase access to training opportunities in order to increase resident competency. Level of Evidence: IV

scholarly journals The dawn of robotic surgery in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 404-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meijin Nakayama ◽  
F Christopher Holsinger ◽  
Dominique Chevalier ◽  
Ryan K Orosco
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery

Role of robotic surgery in oral and maxillofacial, and head and neck surgery

2012 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farzad Borumandi ◽  
Manolis Heliotis ◽  
Cyrus Kerawala ◽  
Brian Bisase ◽  
Luke Cascarini
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery

The future of robotic surgery in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery

Oral Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 101 ◽  
pp. 104510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akina Tamaki ◽  
James W. Rocco ◽  
Enver Ozer
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
The Future

Reconstruction of Oropharyngeal Defects After Transoral Robotic Surgery. Review and Recommendations of the Commission of Head and Neck Surgery of the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-244
Author(s):  
José Ángel González García ◽  
Carlos Pollán Guisasola ◽  
Carlos Miguel Chiesa Estomba ◽  
Constanza Viña Soria ◽  
David Virós Porcuna
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Transoral Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Spanish Society

scholarly journals Robotic Surgery in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery: A Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caio M. Oliveira ◽  
Hiep T. Nguyen ◽  
Alberto R. Ferraz ◽  
Karen Watters ◽  
Brian Rosman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Robotic Assistance ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Complex Surgical Procedures ◽  
Robot Assisted Surgery

Recent advancements in robotics technology have allowed more complex surgical procedures to be performed using minimally invasive approaches. In this article, we reviewed the role of robotic assistance in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. We highlight the advantages of robot-assisted surgery and its clinical application in this field.

Trans‐oral robotic surgery: a safe and effective tool in head and neck surgery in an Australian rural setting

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnson Huang ◽  
Nicholas Phillips ◽  
James Nightingale ◽  
Srinivas Kondalsamy‐Chennakesavan ◽  
Roger Grigg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Robotic Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Rural Setting
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document