Avoiding and Managing Complications in PCL Reconstruction

2009 ◽  
pp. 75-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane T. Seroyer ◽  
Christopher D. Harner
Keyword(s):  
Pcl Reconstruction

scholarly journals Evaluation of Deep Vein Thrombosis Risk Factors After Arthroscopic Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Observational Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 107602962110305
Author(s):  
Pu Ying ◽  
Wenge Ding ◽  
Xiaowei Jiang ◽  
Yue Xu ◽  
Yi Xue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Color Doppler ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Color Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Pcl Reconstruction ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Pcl Injury ◽  
D Dimer

We evaluated the risk factors of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) after knee arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in patients with only PCL injury. From August 2014 to December 2020, a total of 172 patients who had accepted knee arthroscopic PCL reconstruction underwent the color Doppler ultrasound of bilateral lower-extremities deep veins on 3 days postoperatively. Based on the inspection results, patients were divided into DVT group (18 males and 8 females, mean age 43.62 years) and non-DVT group (108 males and 38 females, mean age 33.96 years). The potential associations of DVT risk and age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, smoking and other factors were analyzed. An old age (OR = 1.090; 95% CI = 1.025-1.158; P = 0.006), a high BMI (OR = 1.509; 95% CI = 1.181-1.929; P = 0.001) and an increased post-surgery D-dimer (OR = 5.034; 95% CI = 2.091-12,117; P ≤ 0.001) value were significantly associated with an elevated DVT risk after knee arthroscopic PCL reconstruction. Increased age, BMI, and postoperative D-dimer were risk factors of DVT following knee arthroscopic PCL reconstruction in patients with only PCL injury.

TECHNIQUE OF ARTHROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED PCL RECONSTRUCTION

Orthopedics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 961-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrdad M Malek ◽  
Gregory C Fanelli
Keyword(s):  
Pcl Reconstruction ◽  
Arthroscopically Assisted

scholarly journals An Anatomically Placed Tibial Tunnel does not Completely Surround a Simulated PCL Reconstruction Graft in the Proximal Tibia

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Kim ◽  
Dustin Baker ◽  
Brian Albers ◽  
Scott G. Kaar
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Pcl Reconstruction ◽  
Posterior Cortex ◽  
Modeling Software ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Tibial Cortex ◽  
Area And Volume

Abstract Introduction It is hypothesized that anatomic tunnel placement will create tunnels with violation of the posterior cortex and subsequently an oblique aperture that is not circumferentially surrounded by bone. In this article, we aimed to characterize posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tibial tunnel using a three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) model. Methods Ten normal knee CTs with the patella, femur, and fibula removed were used. Simulated 11 mm PCL tibial tunnels were created at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees. The morphology of the posterior proximal tibial exit was examined with 3D modeling software. The length of tunnel not circumferentially covered (cortex violation) was measured to where the tibial tunnel became circumferential. The surface area and volume of the cylinder both in contact with the tibial bone and that not in contact with the tibia were determined. The percentages of the stick-out length surface area and volume not in contact with bone were calculated. Results The mean stick-out length of uncovered graft at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees were 26.3, 20.5, 17.3, and 12.7 mm, respectively. The mean volume of exposed graft at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees were 840.8, 596.2, 425.6, and 302.9 mm3, respectively. The mean percent of volume of exposed graft at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees were 32, 29, 25, and 24%, respectively. The mean surface of exposed graft at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees were 372.2, 280.4, 208.8, and 153.3 mm2, respectively. The mean percent of surface area of exposed graft at 55, 50, 45, and 40 degrees were 40, 39, 34, and 34%, respectively. Conclusion Anatomic tibial tunnel creation using standard transtibial PCL reconstruction techniques consistently risks posterior tibial cortex violation and creation of an oblique aperture posteriorly. This risk is decreased with decreasing the angle of the tibial tunnel, though the posterior cortex is still compromised with angles as low as 40 degrees. With posterior cortex violation, a surgeon should be aware that a graft within the tunnel or socket posteriorly may not be fully in contact with bone. This is especially relevant with inlay and socket techniques.

Avoiding tibia physeal injury during double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25
Author(s):  
Stockton Troyer ◽  
Nicolas G Anchustegui ◽  
Connor G Richmond ◽  
Peter C Cannamela ◽  
Aleksei Dingel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Tunnel ◽  
Double Bundle ◽  
Reconstruction Technique ◽  
Pcl Reconstruction ◽  
Turn Angle ◽  
Physeal Injury ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Killer Turn

BackgroundAnatomic studies of the paediatric posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) demonstrate that the tibial attachment spans the epiphysis, physis and metaphysis. To better reproduce the anatomy of the PCL and avoid direct physeal injury, a double-bundle PCL reconstruction technique that includes both an all-epiphysial and an all-metaphyseal tibial tunnel has been proposed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate tibial tunnel placement in a paediatric double-bundle PCL reconstruction technique that avoids direct physeal injury using a 3-D computer model.MethodsTen skeletally immature cadaveric knee specimens (ages 5–11) were used to create 3-D model reconstructions from CT scans. All-metaphyseal and all-epiphysial tibial tunnels were simulated with the goal of maintaining adequate spacing (≥2 mm) between the tibial physis and tunnels to avoid injury. The all-metaphyseal tunnel, simulated at sizes of 5, 6 and 7 mm, entered anteriorly, below the tibial tubercle (apophysis) and exited posteriorly in the metaphyseal PCL footprint, distal to the proximal tibial physis. Four-millimetre all-epiphysial proximal tibial tunnels were simulated to enter the epiphysis anteromedially and exit posteriorly at the central epiphysial region of the PCL footprint, proximal to the physis. The distance was measured from the all-metaphyseal tunnels to the physis posteriorly and from the all-epiphysial tunnels to the physis, both anteriorly and posteriorly.ResultsIn all specimens, the 4 mm all-epiphysial tunnel and the 5, 6 and 7 mm all-metaphyseal tunnels maintained adequate spacing, ≥2 mm from the physis. In the specimens aged 5–7 years, the 5, 6 and 7 mm all-metaphyseal tunnels measured a mean distance of 3.5, 2.8 and 2.5 mm from the physis, respectively. In the specimens aged 8–11 years, the 5, 6 and 7 mm all-metaphyseal tunnels measured a mean distance of 3.4, 2.9 and 2.6 mm from the physis. In the specimens aged 5–7 years, the all-epiphysial tunnel measured a mean of 2.1 mm to the physis anteriorly and a mean of 2.8 mm posteriorly. In the specimens aged 8–11 years, the all-epiphysial tunnel measured a mean of 2.2 mm to the physis anteriorly and 2.4 mm posteriorly.ConclusionThese computer-aided 3-D models of paediatric knees illustrate that 5, 6 and 7 mm all-metaphyseal tunnels as well as 4 mm all-epiphysial tunnels can be placed without direct injury to the proximal tibial physis. The margin of error for direct physeal injury is small, especially for the all-epiphysial tunnel. Further, the all-epiphysial tunnel, while reproducing the anatomy of the PCL epiphysial attachment, may also produce a more extreme ‘killer turn’ of the graft. Modifications to the all-epiphysial tunnel may be considered to reduce the impact of the high ‘killer turn’ angle on the tibia.Level of evidenceIV.

scholarly journals Posterior Tibial Slope and Risk of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 312-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Bernhardson ◽  
Nicholas N. DePhillipo ◽  
Blake T. Daney ◽  
Mitchell I. Kennedy ◽  
Zachary S. Aman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Tibial Slope ◽  
Posterior Tibial Slope ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Mechanism Of Injury ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Pcl Reconstruction ◽  
Posterior Tibial ◽  
Pcl Injury ◽  
Age And Sex

Background: Recent biomechanical studies have identified sagittal plane posterior tibial slope as a potential risk factor for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury because of its effects on the kinematics of the native and surgically treated knee. However, the literature lacks clinical correlation between primary PCL injuries and decreased posterior tibial slope. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare the amount of posterior tibial slope between patients with PCL injuries and age/sex-matched controls with intact PCLs. It was hypothesized that patients with PCL injuries would have a significantly decreased amount of posterior tibial slope when compared with patients without PCL injuries. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent primary PCL reconstruction without anterior cruciate ligament injury between 2010 and 2017 by a single surgeon were retrospectively analyzed. Measurements of posterior tibial slope were performed with lateral radiographs of PCL-injured knees and matched controls without clinical or magnetic resonance imaging evidence of ligamentous injury. Mean values of posterior tibial slope were compared between the groups. Inter- and intrarater agreement was assessed for the tibial slope measurement technique via a 2-way random effects model to calculate the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: In sum, 104 patients with PCL tears met the inclusion criteria, and 104 controls were matched according to age and sex. There were no significant differences in age ( P = .166), sex ( P = .345), or body mass index ( P = .424) between the PCL-injured and control groups. Of the PCL tear cohort, 91 patients (87.5%) sustained a contact mechanism of injury, while 13 (12.5%) reported a noncontact mechanism of injury. The mean ± SD posterior tibial slopes were 5.7°± 2.1° (95% CI, 5.3°-6.1°) and 8.6°± 2.2° (95% CI, 8.1°-9.0°) for the PCL-injured and matched control groups, respectively ( P < .0001). Subgroup analysis of the PCL-injured knees according to mechanism of injury demonstrated significant differences in posterior tibial slope between noncontact (4.6°± 1.8°) and contact (6.2°± 2.2°) injuries for all patients with PCL tears ( P = .013) and among patients with isolated PCL tears ( P = .003). The tibial slope measurement technique was highly reliable, with an ICC of 0.852 for interrater reliability and an ICC of 0.872 for intrarater reliability. Conclusion: A decreased posterior tibial slope was associated with patients with PCL tears as compared with age- and sex-matched controls with intact PCLs. Decreased tibial slope appears to be a risk factor for primary PCL injury. However, further clinical research is needed to assess if decreased posterior tibial slope affects posterior knee stability and outcomes after PCL reconstruction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document