“Math, I Don’t Get It”: An Exploratory Study on Verbalizing Mathematical Content by Students with Speech and Language Impairment, Students with Learning Disability, and Students Without Special Educational Needs

2019 ◽  
pp. 377-399
Author(s):  
Birgit Werner ◽  
Margit Berg ◽  
Rebecca Höhr
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Hall-Mills

In the United States, the Response to Intervention framework provides tiered levels of support in general education (kindergarten through grade 12) to improve student outcomes and may relate to special education determinations. While broadly applied to eligibility determinations for children with specific learning disability, the Response to Intervention model also presents an interesting consideration for children with language impairment. The requirement of the Response to Intervention framework in education policy may have a significant impact on the identification and eligibility processes for children with special educational needs. The aim of the present study was to explore whether this policy implementation altered the prevalence of students with disabilities ages 3–21 years who were determined to be eligible for special education under the categories of specific learning disability and language impairment. Longitudinal data was examined to determine whether significant changes occurred in the prevalence rates in a state that mandated implementation of Response to Intervention policy. The results revealed that significant changes occurred in the prevalence rates from pre-to post implementation of Response to Intervention policy; language impairment prevalence increased and specific learning disability prevalence decreased. Prevalence changes have maintained over multiple subsequent school years. The findings have important implications for policy and practices focused on the identification of these common disabilities throughout the school years.


2006 ◽  
Vol 140A (5) ◽  
pp. 509-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Zeesman ◽  
Małgorzata J.M. Nowaczyk ◽  
Ikuko Teshima ◽  
Wendy Roberts ◽  
Janis Oram Cardy ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine J. Alcock ◽  
Richard E. Passingham ◽  
Kate Watkins ◽  
Faraneh Vargha-Khadem

2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 247-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Kasper ◽  
Julia Kreis ◽  
Fülöp Scheibler ◽  
Delia Möller ◽  
Guido Skipka ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
JENNIFER REID ◽  
SALLY MILLAR ◽  
MORAG L DONALDSON ◽  
ROBERT GRIEVE ◽  
LOUISE TAIT ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacy Bezerra Parmera ◽  
Isabel Junqueira de Almeida ◽  
Marcos Castello Barbosa de Oliveira ◽  
Marcela Lima Silagi ◽  
Camila de Godoi Carneiro ◽  
...  

Introduction: Corticobasal syndrome (CBS) is a progressive neurological disorder related to multiple underlying pathologies, including four-repeat tauopathies, such as corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy, and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Speech and language are commonly impaired, encompassing a broad spectrum of deficits. We aimed to investigate CBS speech and language impairment patterns in light of a multimodal imaging approach.Materials and Methods: Thirty-one patients with probable CBS were prospectively evaluated concerning their speech–language, cognitive, and motor profiles. They underwent positron emission tomography with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) and [11C]Pittsburgh Compound-B (PIB-PET) on a hybrid PET-MRI machine to assess their amyloid status. PIB-PET images were classified based on visual and semi-quantitative analyses. Quantitative group analyses were performed on FDG-PET data, and atrophy patterns on MRI were investigated using voxel-based morphometry (VBM). Thirty healthy participants were recruited as imaging controls.Results: Aphasia was the second most prominent cognitive impairment, presented in 67.7% of the cases, following apraxia (96.8%). We identified a wide linguistic profile, ranging from nonfluent variant-primary progressive aphasia to lexical–semantic deficits, mostly with impaired verbal fluency. PIB-PET was classified as negative (CBS-A– group) in 18/31 (58%) and positive (CBS-A+ group) in 13/31 (42%) patients. The frequency of dysarthria was significantly higher in the CBS-A– group than in the CBS-A+ group (55.6 vs. 7.7%, p = 0.008). CBS patients with dysarthria had a left-sided hypometabolism at frontal regions, with a major cluster at the left inferior frontal gyrus and premotor cortex. They showed brain atrophy mainly at the opercular frontal gyrus and putamen. There was a positive correlation between [18F]FDG uptake and semantic verbal fluency at the left inferior (p = 0.006, R2 = 0.2326), middle (0.0054, R2 = 0.2376), and superior temporal gyri (p = 0.0066, R2 = 0.2276). Relative to the phonemic verbal fluency, we found a positive correlation at the left frontal opercular gyrus (p = 0.0003, R2 = 0.3685), the inferior (p = 0.0004, R2 = 0.3537), and the middle temporal gyri (p = 0.0001, R2 = 0.3993).Discussion: In the spectrum of language impairment profile, dysarthria might be helpful to distinguish CBS patients not related to AD. Metabolic and structural signatures depicted from this feature provide further insights into the motor speech production network and are also helpful to differentiate CBS variants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document