Introducing Corporate Water Stewardship in the Context of Global Water Governance

Author(s):  
Thérèse Rudebeck
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-113
Author(s):  
Cora Kammeyer ◽  
Ross Hamilton ◽  
Jason Morrison

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Baumgartner ◽  
Claudia Pahl-Wostl

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 83-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dave Huitema ◽  
Sander Meijerink

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-192
Author(s):  
Jorge E. Viñuales

AbstractThe 2018 report issued by a High-Level Panel on Water convened by the UN Secretary-General and the President of the World Bank, and consisting of 11 sitting heads of State and government, concluded that one of the main challenges facing global water governance is integration. Finding ways of integrating the different layers and areas of global water governance will, in turn, require institutional innovation. This article explores the potential of a well-tested yet largely under-studied approach to integration, namely that provided by the UNECE/WHO-Europe Protocol on Water and Health. It proposes that the Protocol be relied on both as an instrument and as a model that can be harnessed in four main ways: accession by a State or a regional organization (eg the EU) to the Protocol; amendment to give the Protocol a global scope; as a model framework for development, cooperation and foreign policy; as a model framework for the adoption of a contextualized instrument in another regional context.


Author(s):  
Hussein A. Amery

Using a Malthusian framework, Chapter 3 draws parallels between political economy of the Southeast Anatolian (Güneydoğu Anadolu Projesi or GAP) dam project in Turkey that affects water flow to the downstream neighbors of Syria and Iraq on the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers and the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) nearing completion on the Blue Nile in Ethiopia – a project that will impound waters destined for Egypt. It finds that in each case, geographical and hydropolitical positioning are the essential elements of downstream state insecurity and therefore a significant causes of deteriorating relations within the respective river basins. While noting that although the riparian states in question have long histories of tension and distrust, the historical record shows that the vast majority of global water disputes are settled peacefully. The chapter presents evidence that in the lower riparian states, rapid population growth, infrastructure development, and climate change present adverse and cumulative effects on water supplies and water management. The author concludes with the argument that the convergence of these factors points to a likely future of water scarcity-induced conflict absent the introduction of policies to boost irrigation efficiency and improve water governance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document