Bullying in Intimate Partner Relationships: Teen Dating Violence and Adult Intimate Partner Violence as Forms of Bullying

2019 ◽  
pp. 167-185
Author(s):  
Paul R. Smokowski ◽  
Caroline B. R. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Dating Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Teen Dating Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Intimate Partner Relationships ◽  
Partner Relationships ◽  
Teen Dating

Teens' experiences of harsh parenting and exposure to severe intimate partner violence: Adding insult to injury in predicting teen dating violence.

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest N. Jouriles ◽  
Victoria Mueller ◽  
David Rosenfield ◽  
Renee McDonald ◽  
M. Catherine Dodson
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Dating Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Teen Dating Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Harsh Parenting ◽  
Teen Dating

Intimate Partner Violence in Childhood: Human Rights Implications in Multiple Exposure Scenarios

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-121
Author(s):  
Leyla-Denisa Obreja
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Dating Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Teen Dating Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Multiple Exposure ◽  
Adult Relationships ◽  
State Obligations ◽  
Teen Dating

Intimate partner violence (ipv) is a concept primarily associated with abusive manifestations occurring in adult relationships. When children are recognised as part of the phenomenon, they are often referred to as witnesses to their parent’s violence. However, children can be victimised by ipv through multiple exposure scenarios. They can experience ipv as perpetrators, victims or witnesses. The human rights of children can be breached through a failure to provide them with safe social and family spaces critically necessary for their appropriate development. This article identifies State obligations related to the protection of children against teen dating violence and parental intimate partner violence. Moreover, it provides human rights arguments for a change of narrative, encouraging all stakeholders to recognise children as right holders in ipv. Finally, the article raises novel questions regarding the ways in which efforts to prevent ipv affecting children and tdv should be shaped.

Promising Practices in the Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence Among Adolescents

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 849-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa De Grace ◽  
Angela Clarke
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Violence Prevention ◽  
Dating Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Prevention Programs ◽  
Teen Dating Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
National Registry ◽  
Effective Prevention ◽  
Teen Dating

To inform practitioners and researchers interested in the prevention of intimate partner violence (IPV) among adolescents, 9 principles of effective prevention programs (Nation et al., 2003) were described and examples of how these principles have been incorporated into existing teen dating violence prevention programs were provided. An investigation of current prevention practices for adolescent IPV resulted in one noteworthy program that has successfully incorporated all 9 principles of effective prevention programming—Safe Dates (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Registry of Evidence-based Programs and Practices [SAMHSA-NREPP], 2006). Although Safe Dates serves as a model teen dating violence prevention program, it may not be equally effective across contexts and diverse groups. Therefore, as researchers and practitioners continue to develop and refine programs to reduce adolescent IPV, the principles of effective prevention programs should serve as a guiding framework.

The Broken Rainbow: Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-178
Author(s):  
Kirsty Farrugia ◽  
Beverly Abela
Keyword(s):  
Intimate Partner Violence ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Intimate Partner ◽  
Same Sex ◽  
Policies And Procedures ◽  
Intimate Partner Relationships ◽  
Partner Relationships ◽  
And Bisexual

This paper focuses on same-sex intimate partner violence (SSIPV), the effects on the victim within a same-sex relationship, the services available locally for LGB victims, and the barriers encountered by the victims within the services. It explores whether the services offering aid to lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) victims of same-sex intimate partner relationships are effective, since locally there is not a service that offers specific SSIPV support yet. It inquires if the services are gay-affirmative by implementing gay-affirmative strategies, policies, and procedures. It aims to create awareness that same-sex intimate partner violence takes place so as to break the silence in relation to this matter locally. The paper also outlines the importance of having both LGBTIQ services and DV services for the victims to turn to, services they feel comfortable with and can disclose to.

Dating Violence, Protection Orders, and Gender Inequality: A Cross-state Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation

2021 ◽  
pp. 088626052110283
Author(s):  
Katherine Brandt ◽  
Michelle Johnson-Motoyama
Keyword(s):  
Dating Violence ◽  
Gender Inequality ◽  
Partner Violence ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Teen Dating Violence ◽  
Policy Formulation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Health Crisis ◽  
Study Approach ◽  
Teen Dating

Teen dating violence (TDV) is a public health crisis that organizations and individuals in several fields are working to prevent and address. State lawmakers are a group with substantial power to address TDV and intimate partner violence (IPV) through policies including Civil Protection Order (CPO) statutes. Understanding the factors that influence how state legislators craft TDV and IPV policies and how those policies are implemented can lead to policy processes that better serve survivors. Past research suggests the level of gender inequality in a state may be an important influence on TDV policies. This study used a case study approach to compare the processes of adding individuals in dating relationships to CPO statutes in a subset of states ( n = 3) with high, middle, and low levels of gender inequality. Results did not suggest that gender inequality was related to variation between states but rather that it was a larger factor that creates the need for TDV policies at all. Relationships between the state IPV coalitions and lawmakers and the historical moment that laws were considered emerged as important factors in interstate variation. Future research can build on these results by further exploring the role of gender inequality in policy processes with additional states or policies and by examining the factors identified here in greater depth. Implications for practice are also discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document