Considerations for Pain Management in the Burn-Injured Patient

2020 ◽  
pp. 97-108
Author(s):  
Marcos Silva Restrepo ◽  
Arsenio J. Avila I
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S84-S85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen S Romanowski ◽  
Joshua S Carson ◽  
Kate Pape ◽  
Eileen Bernal ◽  
Shelley A Wiechman ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction The most recent ABA pain guidelines were developed over 13 years ago and have not been revised despite the changing practice of burn care. Coupled with the nationwide opioid epidemic there is a need to examine the available literature and revise the ABA practice guidelines for pain management. Methods A committee of a professional association was created to revise the previously published pain guidelines and consisted of a wide range of burn care providers including burn surgeons, burn nurses, anesthesiologists, a pharmacist, and a psychologist. A MEDLINE search of English-language publications from 1968 to 2018 was conducted using the keywords “burn pain,” “treatment,” and “assessment”. Selected other references were also used based on our evaluation of the greater pain literature. Studies were graded by 2 members of the committee using Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine – Levels of Evidence (level 1 being the highest and level 5 the lowest). When there was a disagreement, a third member of the committee was used to resolve the disagreement. Our next step was to meet as a group and determine what our expert consensus was on a variety of topics related to treating pain in burn-injured patients. Finally, we assessed gaps in the knowledge that was available and determined research questions that would aid us in providing better recommendations for the care of the burn-injured patient. Results The literature search produced 189 papers, of which 95 were found to be relevant to the assessment and treatment of burn pain. From the greater pain literature, 115 references were included so a total of 210 papers were analyzed. The greatest number of papers were level 5 evidence (62, 29.5%) while only 30 (14.3%) were level 1. Following the review of the literature and meeting to establish consensus, 18 guidelines were established in the areas of pain assessment, opioid pain medications, non-opioid pain medications, regional anesthesia, and non-pharmacologic treatments. Conclusions While there is increasing research on various pain management modalities, the available studies are inadequate to create a true standard of care. Despite this, our committee reached a consensus using available literature from burn or other areas, expert experience and knowledge of pain physiology. Moving forward we call for more burn specific research into all modalities for burn pain control as well as research on multimodal pain control. Applicability of Research to Practice Burn pain is particularly difficult to manage and further study is needed to develop a standard of care for burn pain management.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward A. Bittner ◽  
Connie W. Chaudhary

Anesthetic management of burn-injured patients can be particularly challenging. Burn-injured patients exhibit pathophysiologic changes that can affect nearly all the organs in the body. Challenges the anesthesiologist may encounter when caring for burn patients include difficult airway management, impaired lung function, vascular access issues, hypothermia, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic alterations, and pain management. Other important considerations that could affect the condition of burn patients include blood loss, hypermetabolism, pain control, and temperature management.  Anticipating appropriate precautions can change the clinical outcome of these patients.  Optimal care requires a full understanding of the unique preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative issues of the burn-injured patient. This review contains 2 figures, 3 tables, and 77 references. Key Words: anesthetic management of acute burns, burn injury, electrical injury, fluid resuscitation, inhalation injury, Parkland formula, pain management


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Mantuani ◽  
Josh Luftig ◽  
Andrew Herring ◽  
Andrea Dreyfuss ◽  
Arun Nagdev

Single injection, ultrasound-guided nerve blocks have drastically changed the multimodal approach to pain management of the acutely injured patient in the emergency department (ED). Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve blocks in the ED have become standard aspects of multiple, hospital system pain management protocols, with early evidence demonstrating improved patient outcomes. Developing a multimodal pain management strategy can improve analgesia while reducing reliance on opioids in this era of opioid addiction.1 The single injection, ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a technique safely used for pain control for rib fractures that can be easily performed at the bedside and integrated into optimal emergency care. A more inferiorly located ultrasound-guided ESP block has been recently described in the anesthesia literature for perioperative pain control for various abdominal surgeries but has not yet been described for patients with acute appendicitis. Here we describe a single injection, lower ESP block performed by emergency physicians that successfully alleviated pain from acute appendicitis in an ED patient awaiting definitive surgical treatment. Along with allowing clinicians to actively manage pain without reliance on opioids, this novel ED technique may improve patient care outcomes.


Anaesthesia ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (11) ◽  
pp. 1031-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
The Real ◽  

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 100703
Author(s):  
Shantanu Warhadpande ◽  
Stephanie L. Dybul ◽  
Minhaj S. Khaja

1998 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 1019-1074
Author(s):  
M WALLJR ◽  
A HIRSHBERG ◽  
K MATTOX
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (15) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
WILLIAM E. GOLDEN ◽  
ROBERT H. HOPKINS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document