Review of Resilient Urban Water Planning Policy and Practice in California

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-48
Author(s):  
Teresa Sprague
2013 ◽  
pp. 129-146
Author(s):  
Cara Beal ◽  
Rodney Stewart ◽  
Damien Giurco ◽  
Kriengsak Panuwatwanich

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 397-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Brookfield

Neighbourhood planning, introduced through the Localism Act 2011, was intended to provide communities in England with new opportunities to plan and manage development. All communities were presented as being readily able to participate in this new regime with Ministers declaring it perfectly conceived to encourage greater involvement from a wider range of people. Set against such claims, while addressing significant gaps in the evidence, this paper provides a critical review of participation in neighbourhood planning, supported by original empirical evidence drawn from case study research. It does so at an interesting time as the community, and/or neighbourhood, appears across political parties as a preferred scalar focus for planning. Challenging Ministers’ assertions, while mirroring past experiments in community planning, participation is found to be modest and partial, concentrated amongst a few, relatively advantaged communities, and relatively advantaged interests within those communities. The paper considers the implications for future planning policy and practice.


2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney A. Stewart ◽  
Rachelle Willis ◽  
Damien Giurco ◽  
Kriengsak Panuwatwanich ◽  
Guillermo Capati

The Lancet ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 388 (10062) ◽  
pp. 2936-2947 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F Sallis ◽  
Fiona Bull ◽  
Ricky Burdett ◽  
Lawrence D Frank ◽  
Peter Griffiths ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (0) ◽  
pp. 1-22
Author(s):  
Sally Cawood ◽  
Md. Fazle Rabby

In this paper we use an anti, intra and inter-categorical intersectional approach, and ethnographic enquiry in Dhaka, Bangladesh, to nuance debate over gender and participation in urban water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) projects in low-income settlements. We make three claims. First, that a mismatch exists between how ‘women’ are framed and targeted in WASH projects and everyday experience characterised by the unequal distribution of benefits and burdens. Second, the likelihood of participation and leadership in WASH projects differs between women according, especially, to age, income, marital and occupancy status, social and political relationships. Third, the same interconnected leaders - including married ‘power couples’ - are involved in all development projects, with implications for the consolidation of power and authority. We call for urban development research, policy and practice to better engage with difference and the conflicting roles certain women and men play in NGO management, local politics and broader claim-making.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document