Multiple Brain Metastases

2020 ◽  
pp. 225-232
Author(s):  
Frederic Dhermain
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Multiple Brain Metastases

Management of multiple brain metastases via dual-isocenter VMAT stereotactic radiosurgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison N Palmiero ◽  
Denise Fabian ◽  
William St Clair ◽  
Marcus Randall ◽  
Damodar Pokhrel
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Multiple Brain Metastases

Feasibility of 5-mm vs 2.5-mm width multileaf collimator in noncoplanar volumetric modulated arc stereotactic radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kotaro Yoshio ◽  
Akihisa Wakita ◽  
Kento Hisazumi ◽  
Takahiro Kitayama ◽  
Nobuhisa Tajiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiotherapy ◽  
Multileaf Collimator ◽  
Multiple Brain Metastases

scholarly journals Current treatment of patients with multiple brain metastases

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven D. Chang ◽  
John R. Adler
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Mass Effect ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Rapid Reduction ◽  
Multiple Brain Metastases ◽  
Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Multiple Metastases ◽  
Difficult Challenge

The management of patients with multiple brain metastases remains a difficult challenge for neurosurgeons. This patient population has a poor prognosis when compared with those harboring a solitary brain metastasis, and historically treatment has generally consisted of administering whole-brain radiotherapy once the diagnosis of multiple brain metastases is made. Resection can be useful in a subset of patients with multiple metastases in whom one or two of the lesions are symptomatic, as this may provide rapid reduction of mass effect and edema. Furthermore, the authors of recent studies have shown that stereotactic radiosurgery can be used in certain patients with multiple brain metastases as part of the treatment regimen. In this review the authors outline the treatment options and indications as well as a management strategy for the treatment of patients with multiple brain metastases.

OC-0475: Cranial SRS dosimetry audits of complex treatments of multiple brain metastases

2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S267-S268
Author(s):  
M. Shaw ◽  
J. Kenny ◽  
A. Alves ◽  
C. Davey ◽  
S. Keehan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Multiple Brain Metastases

A phase II study of anlotinib plus whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with multiple brain metastases.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21063-e21063
Author(s):  
Xiangzhi Zhu ◽  
Hua Tao ◽  
Ming Jiang ◽  
Meiqi Shi ◽  
Cheng Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Multiple Brain Metastases ◽  
Common Grade

e21063 Background: The prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients(pts) with multiple brain metastases is poor. WBRT is the main treatment for the pts, but QUARTZ study showed that the efficacy of WBRT is unsatisfactory. The synergistic effect of the antiangiogenic therapy with radiation therapy has been well established. Anlotinib, an antiangiogenic multi-target TKI, had significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) of advanced NSCLC with Brain Metastases. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with WBRT in pts with brain metastases ( > 3) from advanced NSCLC. Methods: Advanced NSCLC pts with brain metastases ( > 3) who were histologically confirmed to be driver gene wild type or positive and pts who had received two or more previous treatments were eligible. Pts with meningeal metastasis were excluded. All pts were treated with anlotinib (12 mg, QD, day 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle) combined with WBRT (DT 30Gy/12f), followed by maintenance therapy with anlotinib until disease progression or treatment intolerance. The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). Secondary endpoints were extracranial PFS (ePFS), OS and toxicity. Results: As of 25 Jan 2021, 28 pts were enrolled. The median age was 57.5 years with 46.4% male. 89.3% of pts with adenocarcinoma. 21.4% pts harbored EGFR mutation. A total of 25 pts were included in efficacy analysis. In intracranial evaluation, ORR was 64.0%, DCR was 88.0%, median iPFS was 11.1 months (95% CI 5.9 to 12.1). In extracranial evaluation, ORR was 12.0%, DCR was 84.0%, median ePFS was 6.0months (95% CI 3.2 to 8.8). Most common grade 1-2 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension (67.8%), fatigue (64.2%)，anorexia (46.4%) and hand and foot skin reaction (37.5%). The most common grade 3-4 AEs were hypertension (12.5%), hand and foot skin reaction (10.7%) and fatigue (7.2%). No intracranial hemorrhage occurred during treatment. Dose adjustment due to AE occurred in 21.4% patients. Conclusions: This prospective study shows that the combination of anlotinib and WBRT for patients with multiple brain metastases after standard treatment resistance exhibited an effective therapeutic approach and manageable AEs. For further investigation, large sample and additional clinical trials are warranted. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900022093.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document