A Young Child with Activity-Limiting Back Pain for the Last 3 Months

Author(s):  
Jefferson W. Jex ◽  
Richard M. Schwend
Keyword(s):  
2007 ◽  
Vol 39 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S123-S124
Author(s):  
Michael J. OʼBrien ◽  
Christine M. Curtis ◽  
Pierre DʼHemecourt
Keyword(s):  

1984 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 183-189
Author(s):  
William P. Bunnell

Back pain in a young child or adolescent is an unusual complaint and must be regarded as a possible indication of the presence of significant pathology. Functional and mechanical causes of back pain in this age group are uncommon; therefore, it is most important that a vigorous attempt be made to establish the primary diagnosis. The purpose of this paper is to review the distinctive features of the history and physical examination that may lead to accurate diagnosis, and to outline a logical approach to the laboratory and radiographic evaluation for each of the major causes of back pain. HISTORY A carefully obtained medical history is frequently the most helpful factor in establishing a diagnosis. In addition to providing important information, it also establishes an attitude of mutual trust and understanding between the physician and patient. A skillfully taken history can help the physician gain vital insight into the patient's attitude toward his or her disease and suggest areas to be emphasized for further evaluation. Specific aspects of the history that are most revealing include: the mode of onset, nature and severity of the pain; a change in symptoms; and associated systemic complaints (Table 1). The mode of onset should be determined as specifically as possible.


2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 780-792
Author(s):  
Susan C. Lipsett ◽  
Mark I. Neuman
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
Jay Blaisdell ◽  
James B. Talmage

Abstract Ratings for “non-specific chronic, or chronic reoccurring, back pain” are based on the diagnosis-based impairment method whereby an impairment class, usually representing a range of impairment values within a cell of a grid, is selected by diagnosis and “specific criteria” (key factors). Within the impairment class, the default impairment value then can be modified using non-key factors or “grade modifiers” such as functional history, physical examination, and clinical studies using the net adjustment formula. The diagnosis of “nonspecific chronic, or chronic reoccurring, back pain” can be rated in class 0 and 1; the former has a default value of 0%, and the latter has a default value of 2% before any modifications. The key concept here is that the physician believes that the patient is experiencing pain, yet there are no related objective findings, most notably radiculopathy as distinguished from “nonverifiable radicular complaints.” If the individual is found not to have radiculopathy and the medical record shows that the patient has never had clinically verifiable radiculopathy, then the diagnosis of “intervertebral disk herniation and/or AOMSI [alteration of motion segment integrity] cannot be used.” If the patient is asymptomatic at maximum medical improvement, then impairment Class 0 should be chosen, not Class 1; a final whole person impairment rating of 1% indicates incorrect use of the methodology.


2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 18-19
Author(s):  
MICHAEL S. JELLINEK
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document