Monitoring Freshwater Macroinvertebrates

Author(s):  
Tim R. New
2006 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 501-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Doi ◽  
Atsushi Takagi ◽  
Chitoshi Mizota ◽  
Jun-ichi Okano ◽  
Shin-ichi Nakano ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 525-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Kelly ◽  
Roberta J. Bailey ◽  
Calum MacNeil ◽  
Jaimie T. A. Dick ◽  
Robbie A. McDonald

2005 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben J. Kefford ◽  
Carolyn G. Palmer ◽  
Dayanthi Nugegoda

Salinity is rising in many southern African and Australian rivers with unknown effects on aquatic organisms. The extent of spatial variation, at any scale, in salt tolerances of aquatic organisms is unknown, so whether data from one location is applicable elsewhere is also unknown. The acute tolerances (72-h median lethal concentration (LC50)) to sea salt of 49 macroinvertebrate taxa from the south-east Eastern Cape (SEEC), South Africa were compared with those of 57 species from the Barwon Catchment, Victoria, Australia. The mean LC50 values from both locations were similar (Barwon: 31 and SEEC: 32 mS cm−1) and less abundant (rare) taxa tended to be more tolerant than more abundant (common) taxa. There was, however, a greater range of LC50 values (5.5–76 mS cm−1) in the Barwon Catchment than in the SEEC (11–47 mS cm−1). The species sensitivity distribution (SSD) for SEEC taxa was bimodal whereas the Barwon Catchment’s SSD had a single peak. With few exceptions, members of an order had similar tolerances in both locations. The differences in SSD between locations were related to crustacean, odonate and non-arthropod relative richness. Although it is not ideal to extrapolate SSDs from one location to another, it may be reasonable to assume similar salinity tolerances among related taxa.


2018 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 368-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonas Jourdan ◽  
Martin Plath ◽  
Jonathan D. Tonkin ◽  
Maria Ceylan ◽  
Arlena C. Dumeier ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew Seymour ◽  
François Edwards ◽  
Jack Cosby ◽  
Pete Scarlet ◽  
Iliana Bista ◽  
...  

Abstract Accurately assessing community diversity in time and space, and linking these patterns to ecological theory, is essential for effective environmental monitoring. Freshwater macroinvertebrates are an important group of taxa routinely used for riverine environmental assessments due to their wide biological, functional and phylogenetic diversity and their responses to environmental factors. Recently, eDNA metabarcoding based sampling and identification has been shown to increase the accuracy of biodiversity assessments, while reducing cost and time, compared to traditional methods. Here, we present results from a field comparison of eDNA versus traditional riverine biodiversity techniques to assess freshwater macroinvertebrates. In addition, we investigated the effects of landuse and seasonality on community and functional diversity, to infer the underlying regional ecological temporal and spatial dynamics. Comparison of biodiversity dynamics based on traditional and eDNA survey methods showed significant differences in taxonomic groups identified between methods, landuse type, and method x season interactions. Our findings are the first example of eDNA derived functional spatio-temporal and dynamics, indicating that the regional shifts in diversity and function are linked to regional seasonal fluctuations in fine particle matter versus localized landuse type. Beta diversity components (nestedness and turnover) differed significantly along the environmental gradient, but in different directions, for each methodology. Overall, our findings show that eDNA based ecological assessment is effective in assessing temporal and spatial diversity and functional dynamics of macroinvertebrates, while demonstrating that these data can be used to infer effective biodiversity assessment and management strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document