Grammatical Modeling of a Nominal Ellipsis Grammar for Spanish

Author(s):  
Hazel Barahona ◽  
Walter Koza
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Victoria Cubau
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 729-753
Author(s):  
Elena Karvovskaya

This paper discusses two particles that mark possession in Ishkashimi: -no and -noy. These markers are not in free variation; -noy can only mark adnominal possession, while -no can mark external possession. This will be argued for on the basis of distributional and interpretational differences between the two markers. Unlike the marker -noy, -no can appear in the context of nominal ellipsis and possessive predicates. A -noy-marked possessor has to be adjacent to the possessed noun and precede it; a -no-marked possessor does not have these adjacency requirements. In the context of possessor doubling, -noy is only compatible with 3rd person. In the case of negation, when the existence of the possessed is denied, only the -no marker is licensed. The differences in the distribution of the two markers correlate with their morphological differences; unlike -no, -noy is morphologically complex and encodes the person of the possessor.


Author(s):  
Norbert Corver ◽  
Marjo van Koppen

This chapter discusses ellipsis in Dutch and the dialects of Dutch. It provides detailed information on the major types of ellipsis as they have been presented in Part III of this handbook: gapping and stripping, predicate ellipsis (VP-ellipsis and pseudogapping), Conjunction Reduction and Right-Node Raising, sluicing, fragments, nominal ellipsis, Comparative Deletion, and Null Complement Anaphora. It discusses the main insights from the literature as well as new observations with respect to these constructions. The final section shows that the Dutch dialects display an enormous amount of variation concerning ellipsis constructions. In particular, it examines the variation in NP-ellipsis with possessive, demonstrative, and adjectival remnants and variation with respect to sluicing.


Lingua ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 151 ◽  
pp. 33-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle Johnson
Keyword(s):  

Lingua ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 122 (10) ◽  
pp. 1070-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Cornilescu ◽  
Alexandru Nicolae
Keyword(s):  

Lingua ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 120 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Eguren

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
Made Ratna Dian Aryani

The focus of this article is about ellipsis that occurs in the discourse in the Balinese folklore. Ellipsis is a part of the cohesiveness of a discourse so that it becomes a complete discourse. The research method used is descriptive qualitative analysis. This study uses ellipsis theory from Halliday and Hasan which is supported by McCarthy's ellipsis deixis theory. The data source was taken from a collection of tales in the Balinese language, namely the book Pupulan Satua Bali II. The results of this study indicate that the ellipsis that occurs in the book of fairy tales is in the form of nominal ellipsis which refers to humans (people) in the conversation and story prologue, verbal ellipsis that occurs in fairy tale conversations, refers to lexical ellipsis in the verb word class, and the ellipsis of clauses because clauses are considered as expressions of speech functions, such as statements, questions, responses, and clauses that have a structural part consisting of core and propositional elements. Even though there is an ellipsis, the process of conveying the content and message of the story is still effective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document