Teamwork Communication in Healthcare: An Instrument (Questionnaire) Validation Process

2021 ◽  
pp. 217-229
Author(s):  
Wasef Matar ◽  
Monther Aldwair
Keyword(s):  
Questionnaire Validation ◽  
Validation Process

scholarly journals ¿Están los futuros profesores formados en inclusión?: Validación de un cuestionario de evaluación

Aula Abierta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Francisca González-Gil ◽  
Elena Martín-Pastor ◽  
Begoña Orgaz Baz
Keyword(s):  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
Inservice Teachers ◽  
Questionnaire Validation ◽  
Validation Process ◽  
Initial Teacher Training ◽  
Item Questionnaire ◽  
Teachers Training ◽  
Validated Instrument ◽  
Estudiantes Universitarios

RESUMENEl objetivo de este trabajo es presentar la validación de una escala para evaluar la formación inicial en educación inclusiva de estudiantes universitarios de las titulaciones de educación. Para ello se partió de una escala que ha pasado ya una primera validación dirigida a profesionales en ejercicio (CEFI-R). Se contó con una muestra de 202 profesores españoles que impartían docencia en todas las etapas educativas y con 495 estudiantes universitarios de los grados de maestro y pedagogía y del máster de secundaria. Se describe el desarrollo del proceso de validación, que ha dado como resultado un cuestionario con 16 ítems agrupados en 4 dimensiones de inclusión: concepción de la diversidad, metodología, apoyos y participación de la comunidad.Palabras Clave: formación inicial, cuestionario, validación, educación inclusiva, estudiantes universitarios.ABSTRACTThe aim of this research is the review and validation of an instrument to assess future teachers training needs for inclusion. To do this, it was used a validated instrument for inservice teachers (CEFI-R). For this purpose, we used a sample of 202 Spanish teachers with experience in all educational stages and 495 students from education Grades and Posgrades. This work describes the validation process, which resulted in the development of a 16-item questionnaire grouped into 4 inclusion indicators: conception of diversity, methodology, supports, and community participation.Keywords: initial teacher training, questionnaire, validation, inclusive education, university students.

scholarly journals ¿Están los futuros profesores formados en inclusión?: Validación de un cuestionario de evaluación

Aula Abierta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Francisca González-Gil ◽  
Elena Martín-Pastor ◽  
Begoña Orgaz Baz
Keyword(s):  
Inclusive Education ◽  
Training Needs ◽  
Inservice Teachers ◽  
Questionnaire Validation ◽  
Validation Process ◽  
Initial Teacher Training ◽  
Item Questionnaire ◽  
Teachers Training ◽  
Validated Instrument ◽  
Estudiantes Universitarios

RESUMENEl objetivo de este trabajo es presentar la validación de una escala para evaluar la formación inicial en educación inclusiva de estudiantes universitarios de las titulaciones de educación. Para ello se partió de una escala que ha pasado ya una primera validación dirigida a profesionales en ejercicio (CEFI-R). Se contó con una muestra de 202 profesores españoles que impartían docencia en todas las etapas educativas y con 495 estudiantes universitarios de los grados de maestro y pedagogía y del máster de secundaria. Se describe el desarrollo del proceso de validación, que ha dado como resultado un cuestionario con 16 ítems agrupados en 4 dimensiones de inclusión: concepción de la diversidad, metodología, apoyos y participación de la comunidad.Palabras Clave: formación inicial, cuestionario, validación, educación inclusiva, estudiantes universitarios.ABSTRACTThe aim of this research is the review and validation of an instrument to assess future teachers training needs for inclusion. To do this, it was used a validated instrument for inservice teachers (CEFI-R). For this purpose, we used a sample of 202 Spanish teachers with experience in all educational stages and 495 students from education Grades and Posgrades. This work describes the validation process, which resulted in the development of a 16-item questionnaire grouped into 4 inclusion indicators: conception of diversity, methodology, supports, and community participation.Keywords: initial teacher training, questionnaire, validation, inclusive education, university students.

scholarly journals INSTRUMENTO DE SEGUIMIENTO A SILABO: PROCESO DE VALIDACIÓN DEL CUESTIONARIO / SYLLABUS MONITORING INSTRUMENT: QUESTIONNAIRE VALIDATION PROCESS

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 65940-65947
Author(s):  
Paola Cristina Toapanta-Pinta ◽  
Sara Rosa Céspedes-Granda ◽  
Patricia Janet Núñez-Hurtado ◽  
Santiago Vasco-Morales
Keyword(s):  
Questionnaire Validation ◽  
Validation Process ◽  
Monitoring Instrument

The “Justice sensitivity questionnaire”: validation in a Russian speaking sample

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 105-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Adamyan ◽  
◽  
S. Nartova-Bochaver ◽  
M. Schmitt ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Questionnaire Validation ◽  
Justice Sensitivity

Questionnaire validation for the evaluation of patients satisfaction with chronic generalized periodontitis physiotherapeutic treatment

2019 ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
G.B. Lyubomirsky ◽  
T.L. Redinova
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Quality Parameters ◽  
Questionnaire Validation ◽  
Dental Procedure ◽  
Dental Services ◽  
Patients Satisfaction ◽  
Literary Sources

This article assesses the reliability, constructive validity and reproducibility of a special questionnaire for determining the quality parameters of rendering physiotherapeutic care to patients with chronic generalized periodontitis. The analysis of literary sources showed that there are studies of quality of dental services, however, we have not met with research into the quality and comfort of physiotherapy procedures for periodontal patients. At the same time, the importance of this issue is obvious and requires study and analysis. Without making judgments about the quality of the service, a full-fledged medical dental procedure can not take place. The assortment of physical devices and methods grows annually, their use in the periodontoloical treatment is not always sufficiently justified, the effectiveness is not always confimed therefore it is important to pay attention not only to the marketing efforts directed by the clinics for comfort, but also to analyze the ideas about the quality of the clinical characteristics of physiotherapeutic procedures.

Advances in standardizing and validating research techniques for pathogen monitoring in water

2004 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 23-30
Author(s):  
K. Connell ◽  
M. Pope ◽  
K. Miller ◽  
J. Scheller ◽  
J. Pulz
Keyword(s):  
Validation Studies ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Monitoring Methods ◽  
Microbiological Method ◽  
Validation Process ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
Target Analytes ◽  
Interlaboratory Validation ◽  
Quality Control Criteria ◽  
Control Criteria

Designing and conducting standardized microbiological method interlaboratory validation studies is challenging because most methods are manual, rather than instrument-based, and results from the methods are typically subjective. Determinations of method recovery, in particular, are problematic, due to difficulties in assessing the true spike amount. The standardization and validation process used for the seven most recent USEPA 1600-series pathogen monitoring methods has begun to address these challenges. A staged development process was used to ensure that methods were adequately tested and standardized before resources were dedicated to interlaboratory validation. The interlaboratory validation studies for USEPA Method 1622, for Cryptosporidium, USEPA Method 1601 for coliphage, and USEPA Method 1605 for Aeromonas assessed method performance using different approaches, due the differences in the nature of the target analytes and the data quality needs of each study. However, the use of enumerated spikes in all of the studies allowed method recovery and precision to be assessed, and also provided the data needed to establish quantitative quality control criteria for the methods.

scholarly journals Numerical Study on an Interface Compression Method for the Volume of Fluid Approach

Fluids ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 80
Author(s):  
Yuria Okagaki ◽  
Taisuke Yonomoto ◽  
Masahiro Ishigaki ◽  
Yoshiyasu Hirose
Keyword(s):  
Linear Theory ◽  
Volume Fraction ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Volume Of Fluid ◽  
Interfacial Wave ◽  
Validation Process ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Numerical Diffusion ◽  
Mesh Resolution ◽  
Water Reactors

Many thermohydraulic issues about the safety of light water reactors are related to complicated two-phase flow phenomena. In these phenomena, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis using the volume of fluid (VOF) method causes numerical diffusion generated by the first-order upwind scheme used in the convection term of the volume fraction equation. Thus, in this study, we focused on an interface compression (IC) method for such a VOF approach; this technique prevents numerical diffusion issues and maintains boundedness and conservation with negative diffusion. First, on a sufficiently high mesh resolution and without the IC method, the validation process was considered by comparing the amplitude growth of the interfacial wave between a two-dimensional gas sheet and a quiescent liquid using the linear theory. The disturbance growth rates were consistent with the linear theory, and the validation process was considered appropriate. Then, this validation process confirmed the effects of the IC method on numerical diffusion, and we derived the optimum value of the IC coefficient, which is the parameter that controls the numerical diffusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document