Research on the Family Check-Up to Support Social and Behavioral Adjustment in Early Elementary School

2021 ◽  
pp. 73-90
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Stormshak ◽  
Alyssa L. Kennedy ◽  
Robyn E. Metcalfe ◽  
Jordan M. Matulis
2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Andrew Garbacz ◽  
Laura Lee McIntyre ◽  
Elizabeth A. Stormshak ◽  
Derek B. Kosty

This study reports results of a randomized, controlled trial examining the efficacy of the Family Check-Up (FCU) initiated during kindergarten on teacher report of children’s emotional and behavior problems in first and second grade. Children’s emotional and behavior needs and the receipt of special services in school at pretest were examined as moderators. Participants were primary caregivers and teachers of 365 children in early elementary school. Using an intent-to-treat approach, results indicated children in the FCU condition outperformed children in a business-as-usual control condition on teacher report of emotional and behavior problems in first and second grade. Children experiencing higher levels of emotional and behavior problems at pretest benefited from the FCU more than did children who experienced lower levels of problems. There was no evidence of moderation by whether children received special services in school. Implications for family-centered interventions, study limitations, and future research directions are discussed.


2021 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 101265
Author(s):  
Carlos Valiente ◽  
Leah D. Doane ◽  
Sierra Clifford ◽  
Kevin J. Grimm ◽  
Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant

1995 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea G. Backscheider ◽  
Susan A. Gelman

ABSTRACTPrevious tasks have shown that preschool and early elementary school-children typically have trouble learning and identifying homonyms (Peters & Zaidel, 1980; Mazzocco, 1989). It is possible that a one-to-one mapping assumption or a lack of metalinguistic skills makes homonym learning and identification particularly difficult. In three experiments we examined a total of 60 three-year-olds' ability to pick out homonym pairs, and the extent to which they realize that although homonyms share a common label, they represent two different categories. In Experiment 1 subjects were asked to identify homonym pairs. In Experiment 2, homonym pairs and non-homonym pairs were labelled, then children were asked whether the pairs had the same name, and whether they were the same kind of thing. In Experiment 3 children were shown one-half of each of several homonym and non-homonym pairs, then asked to identify a name match and a category match from a set of pictures. From these experiments we conclude that children have the metalinguistic skills necessary to identify homonym pairs; moreover, they realized that homonyms represent two different categories. Finally, if children have a one-to-one mapping assumption, it is not strong enough to prevent them from acquiring homonyms.


2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 1813-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol McDonald Connor ◽  
Stephanie L. Day ◽  
Beth Phillips ◽  
Nicole Sparapani ◽  
Sarah W. Ingebrand ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith C. Herman ◽  
Caroline G. Hodgson ◽  
Colleen L. Eddy ◽  
Daniel R. Cohen ◽  
Wendy M. Reinke ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document