General and Specific Sources of Reflected Appraisals

Author(s):  
Mary Gallagher
Keyword(s):  
Contexts ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Amy Johnson Conner ◽  
Ryan Alaniz
Keyword(s):  

Contexts ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 6-7
Author(s):  
Tim Ortyl ◽  
Jeremy Minyard
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 0044118X2095106
Author(s):  
Melissa E. Noel ◽  
Cynthia J. Najdowski

This research sought to identify a potential process by which intergenerational crime occurs, focusing on the effect of parental incarceration on adolescents’ subsequent arrests. We drew from Matsueda’s work on reflected appraisals as an explanatory mechanism for this effect. Thus, the present research examined whether caregivers’ and adolescents’ expectations for adolescents’ future incarceration sequentially mediated the effect of parental incarceration on adolescents’ actual arrest outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to examine this effect in a sample of 1,735 15- to 16-year-olds using NLSY97 data. Parental incarceration was positively related to caregivers’ expectations of adolescents’ future arrest. Moreover, caregivers’ expectations were strongly associated with adolescents’ expectations. Finally, the effect of parental incarceration on adolescents’ actual future arrest likelihood was partially mediated by caregivers’ and adolescents’ expectations for this outcome. This study revealed support for the proposition that the experience of parental incarceration may influence adolescents’ negative outcomes through reflected appraisals.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-42
Author(s):  
HERDIYAN MAULANA ◽  
MEI LESTARI SEKAR DININGRUM

This research aims to know the psychological well-being reflections on intimate-partner-violence-suffering wives who end up in a divorce. Subjects used in this research are two persons. Characteristic samples in this research are women aged 20-30 years who are divorced and have offspring. Research type is in the form of Research Qualitative Case Study. Data intake is the interview and observation methods. This interview is not only conducted to the subjects, but also to the respective significant person who is assumed the nearest to the subjects. Based on the research, Subject I is recorded to have supporting factors to psychological well-beings which are social supports, reflected appraisals, behavioral self-perceptions and religiousness. On the other hand, Subject II is recorded to have supporting factors to psychological well-beings like social supports, social comparisons, reflected appraisals, behavioral self-perceptions, religiousness, marriage motivation, economic factors and divorce age. In general, Subject I has lower level of psychological well-beings than those of Subject II.


Contexts ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 6-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia Cotton Corl ◽  
Meghan Krausch
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward P. Lemay ◽  
Kari L. Dudley
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document