Chronic Pain After Total Knee Replacement

2014 ◽  
pp. 169-178
Author(s):  
Anissa Belbachir ◽  
Gérard Mick
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanja Bossmann ◽  
Torsten Brauner ◽  
Scott Wearing ◽  
Thomas Horstmann

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Adam Johns ◽  
Justine Naylor ◽  
Brinda Thirugnanam ◽  
Dean Mckenzie ◽  
Bernadette Brady ◽  
...  

Abstract Background:Chronic knee pain after a total knee replacement has been estimated to affect 10 to 30% of patients and is related to dissatisfaction with surgery, reduced function and reduced quality of life. Rehabilitation is often prescribed in the subacute period post-operatively, but it may offer benefit to the increasing numbers of patients with chronic pain after their knee replacement. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of rehabilitation to improve pain, function and quality of life in people with chronic knee pain persisting for more than 3 months following a total knee replacement.Methods: The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines with a search of the online databases Ovid Medline, Embase via Ovid, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, Ovid Emcare and Proquest from their earliest date to July 12, 2020. The search criteria included English language randomised controlled trials of rehabilitation strategies in any setting to treat people with chronic knee pain, defined as knee pain persisting for more than 3 months, following a total knee replacement. Rehabilitation programs included exercise therapy, patient education, cognitive and mind-body strategies and self-management and excluded medication trials, procedural techniques and complementary therapies. Results:There were 254 abstracts screened for eligibility with 13 remaining for full-text screening. Following full-text screening, there were no studies that met the eligibility criteria for evaluating rehabilitation therapy to treat chronic knee pain persisting for more than 3 months following a total knee replacement.Conclusion:Despite the high volume of knee replacement surgery and the high incidence of moderate to severe chronic pain ensuing, there is currently no evidence available that rehabilitation commencing three months after surgery can effectively treat chronic pain and disability following a total knee replacement.


2022 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-257
Author(s):  
Aidyl Fitrisyah ◽  
Stevanus Eliansyah Handrawan ◽  
Nurlaili Maya Ramadhanty

Introduction. Chronic pain defines as pain persisting for three months or longer, chronic post-surgical pain can affect all dimensions of health-related quality of life, and is associated with functional limitations. treatment of chronic pain after total knee replacement is challenging, and evaluation of combined treatments and individually targeted treatments matched to patient characteristic. Genicular nerve block radiofrequency ablation is a safe and effective therapeutic procedure for pain associated with chronic pain due to knee osteoarthritis, and the evolution of newer regional analgesia techniques aids in reducing postoperative pain Dual Subsartorial Block (DSB) as a procedure specific, post total knee replacemet. historically there has been a reliance on using a pain-spesific assessment tools Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Case Presentation. A 55-year old woman admitted she had pain on bilateral knee, the knee pain had affected her daily living, she was diagnosed with chronic knee pain post TKR because of osteoarthritis genu bilateral, the patient was planning genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation and dual subsartorial block, from the examination we found that numeric rating scale was 6 (moderate pain) with WOMAC score 76, before the procedure the patients are examined through radiology for any deformity in the knee. The genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation under ultrasound guidance on bonylandmark, resulting anesthesia of the anterior compartment of the knee, and dual subsartorial block that cover almost all the innervations of pain generating component of the anterior and posterior knee joint involved in TKR surgery. After the procedure we reevaluated the pain score using NRS was 2 (mild pain), and with WOMAC Score 19. Conclusion. Treatment of chronic pain post total knee replacemet was challenging, targeted treatment may ameliorate the pain and prevent long term disability.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-155
Author(s):  
Baran Şen ◽  
Onur Engin ◽  
Hülya Ellidokuz ◽  
Mesude Eken ◽  
Hasan Tatari ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e028093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew David Beswick ◽  
Jane Dennis ◽  
Rachael Gooberman-Hill ◽  
Ashley William Blom ◽  
Vikki Wylde

ObjectivesFor many people with advanced osteoarthritis, total knee replacement (TKR) is an effective treatment for relieving pain and improving function. Features of perioperative care may be associated with the adverse event of chronic pain 6 months or longer after surgery; effects may be direct, for example, through nerve damage or surgical complications, or indirect through adverse events. This systematic review aims to evaluate whether non-surgical perioperative interventions prevent long-term pain after TKR.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of perioperative interventions for adults with osteoarthritis receiving primary TKR evaluated in a randomised controlled trial (RCT). We searchedThe Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL until February 2018. After screening, two reviewers evaluated articles. Studies at low risk of bias according to the Cochrane tool were included.InterventionsPerioperative non-surgical interventions; control receiving no intervention or alternative treatment.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPain or score with pain component assessed at 6 months or longer postoperative.Results44 RCTs at low risk of bias assessed long-term pain. Intervention heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis and definitive statements on effectiveness. Good-quality research provided generally weak evidence for small reductions in long-term pain with local infiltration analgesia (three studies), ketamine infusion (one study), pregabalin (one study) and supported early discharge (one study) compared with no intervention. For electric muscle stimulation (two studies), anabolic steroids (one study) and walking training (one study) there was a suggestion of more clinically important benefit. No concerns relating to long-term adverse events were reported. For a range of treatments there was no evidence linking them with unfavourable pain outcomes.ConclusionsTo prevent chronic pain after TKR, several perioperative interventions show benefits and merit further research. Good-quality studies assessing long-term pain after perioperative interventions are feasible and necessary to ensure that patients with osteoarthritis achieve good long-term outcomes after TKR.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. S400-S401
Author(s):  
V. Wylde ◽  
J. Bruce ◽  
F. MacKichan ◽  
R. Gooberman-Hill

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document